In response to:

Chambliss on Benghazi Hearing: ‘So Obvious’ It Was a Terrorist Attack

Kevin348 Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 3:00 AM
zw, They are. It's called Benghazi.
MudontheTires Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 9:59 AM
"No, let's consider the facts."

They already were, in Popular science.
James____Tx Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 6:21 AM
Sounds like the typical Obama voter.
Lady Wolverine Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 6:19 AM
They have to ignore reality. They can't deal with the truth.
James____Tx Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 6:15 AM
And it happens fast when the metal is soaked in Jet fuel which burns at a very high temp.

But 911 truthers ignore this.
Simplecaveman Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 6:09 AM
wpeeters Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 3:49 AM
And you speak as an experienced "Construction Engineer" I assume?
Or as a dumb moronic brainless liberal?
That's my guess.
Kevin348 Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 3:17 AM
Yet you think in 7 hours of heavy combat the President knew nothing about Benghazi.
zwheaton Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 3:04 AM
No, let's consider the facts. An airplane crashes into the top of a 100 story building. Within 1 hour, somehow the entire skyscraper collapses into a fine powder. Ok... that usually happens.

Lawmakers on intelligence committees met behind closed doors today to get a more detailed account of what happened during the September 11th attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, which left four Americans dead.

In closed-door sessions, lawmakers got their most comprehensive account to date of what happened on the ground in Benghazi on September 11, a senior intelligence official told CNN. They also heard an explanation as to what U.S. officials were doing behind the scenes to respond, the official said, adding that the presentation would clarify some mischaracterizations about the nature of the attack.

...