Is Sen. Ricardo Lara also bent on forcing girls to camp with boys and adult men who are attracted to females? If not, why not? There are other scouting organizations and people can always start another one. Why try to force the BSA to conform to their whims? Because it isn't about their freedom. It is about forcing everyone else to applaud and affirm their behaviors.

All one must do is note that men and women are different and thus the uniting of both sexes is different from other kinds of associations. States are allowed to treat different kinds of associations differently. This is not a religious argument, it is an argument based on basic biological reality that most people understand and live by, with perhaps the excption of a very, very few people, most of whom required many years of brainwashing to arrive at their stated opinion. and unless they are neuterally bisexual, they are hypocrites.

I meant to write "...and they believe God has said SEX IS ONLY FOR marriage and..."

We should not underestimate #6. Search "marriage strike" "Men Going Their Own Way" or "MGTOW" and "Leykis 101". The way a lot of men see it, the ONLY benefit to getting married is ***IF*** they believe in God and they believe God has said marriage and they actually want a sex life. Take away any of those three, and they see no benefit for a man to marry in today's culture.

If licenses have to be hored by all states, it is going to be fun when someone from a state that gives licenses for carrying certain firearms moved to a restrictive state!

The polling has been atrocious. Often, they imply that unless you support the complete neutering of marriage, then gay relationships are entirely illegal. False dilemma. When the option of civil unions are included, many people prefer that option. It is true that the latest generation, which has no belief whatsoever in gender roles or a child's need for a father, or that there is anything wrong with casual sex or raising children out of wedlick, or shacking up, or divorcing... they don't see what the big deal is, and so their homosexual friends and idols tell them "Neutering marriag will make us happy!" and they say, "Sure. What do I care?" Rather than rolling over and abdicating our votes to 19-year-olds, how about teaching them morals???

Literally from the first book of the Bible to the last, marriage is presented as something uniting a bride and groom, and sex is presented as something for marriage. Don't like that? OK, but if someone claims to be a Bible believer, they can't legitimately ignore these teachings.

Because all of the rules and common sense have to be abandoned to esteem the feelings of homosexuals, of course.

That doesn't mean I think all hetero males are pedophiles. I am a hetero male myself and not a pedophile. But for the same reason, I would not want my boy in those situations with a homosexual man.

The BSA are being subjected to homofascism and the feministas. Joining the BSA is voluntary. There is no requirement that anyone be a scout. There are other scouting orgazations, but the homofascists and feministas won't allow the BSA their freedom ot association. Boys, who are increasingly being raised without fathers and without male teachers and few good male role models in television and movies, need SOME place where they can go for male bonding and socialization that hasn't been feminized, and where they won't have the thought of someone attracted to their gender (hetero girls or homo boys/scout leaders) watching them. As others have pointed out, I would not send my daughter on a camping trip or to the home of an unrelated hetero male

Kudos for addressing this. You're going to get attacked by your "sisters". This is one big reason why some men have gone on a marriage strike (Google it). Not me. I'm happily married. But God forbid my wife get a brain injury and decide to do something like this to me. The courts give her the power to. I predict this will ONLY be changed after a lesbian couple divorces and the one who earns more is tagged for child support for an affair the other one had with a man. The suing lesbian will pount out she has never engaged in reproductive behavior. Then, men will be able to use this because of "equality". Unless the courts want to keep treating gays differently. We'll see.