1 - 10 Next
But it will be interesting to watch the same court that said in the DOMA case that the federal government must defer to states on marriage turn around and let federal courts force the neutering of licenses on states.
It doesn't harm kosher food if my cheeseburger, topped with bacon-wrapped shrimp, is sold as "kosher". And yes, government can enforce kosher labeling.
States issue marriage licenses rather than making people jump through a bunch of separate hoops. You can "keep government out of marriage" until someone leaves the relationship, or dies, or wants to be recognized as next of kin, etc.
Yeah yeah yeah, precedent and separation of powers and all of that... none of it matters. Everything must be sacrificed on the altar of esteeming homosexual behavior.
In response to:

The Last Taboo

Ken the Playful Walrus Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 4:58 PM
I used to scoff at that, until Leftists started demanding human rights be applied to other species.
In response to:

The Last Taboo

Ken the Playful Walrus Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 4:55 PM
"Gay marriage happened because of decades of work done by millions and millions of gay people..." Oh, so it's OK deny minorities "rights" as long as they are a smaller minority?
In response to:

The Last Taboo

Ken the Playful Walrus Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 4:53 PM
I disagree that polygamy will come after pedophilia. It's a tossup as to whether polygamy or incest is next, but those will happen before pedophilia. Consent? The pedophiles have ways of arguing around that. And why does consent really matter, since we're just nothing at all but molecules, qualitatively the same as a pebble. Survival of the fittest, right? Unless something shifts, they will literally keep pushing until their are orgies in front of city hall in broad daylight, complete with whips, chains, children, and animals. I wish I was exaggerating.
Parents have a lot less power now, and many children have figured that out. Consider this. It is entirely legal to let your child grow up to be a spoiled or ill-behaved brat. Doing something to try to prevent that may be illegal. Some parents would rather be ashamed of their children than convicted criminals, so they don't risk breaking the law. As long as the children don't seriously hurt other people or their property before they turn 18, their parents can kick them out and they will be off the book. Society will have to deal with their horrible adult children, but they don't have to deal with them any more than the next guy.
We have to do whatever homosexuality advocates want, because people have been assaulted or discriminated against for homosexual acts, or something. So we must give them whatever they ask for. That's what I've learned from court decisions and media coverage. So, if a homosexuality advocate can point to a case where a homosexual person was murdered by gunfire, even if it had nothing to do with their sexual behavior, we must ban guns, if that is what they want. If you disagree, you're a hateful bigot, you see. A homosexual person who has been shot to death can't very well exercised their right to marry, can they? Don't disagree with me or it means you want teenagers to kill themselves.
Legally, it is until one of the spouses decides to end it, which they can do unilaterally for no reason whatsoever, can they can be financially rewarded for doing so.
1 - 10 Next