Previous 21 - 30 Next
Yes, Matt Towery proved himself to be a complete imbecile with this column which amazingly praises both the Clintons (degenerate, corrupt, tyrants, and murderers with Hillary's involvement with Libya) and the and Jeb Bush who besides wanting to permit 30 million illegals to become citizens, detests the Tea Party. I will never ever support another liberal Republican.
"There are two parties in Washington — the stupid party and the evil party. Every once in a while the stupid party and the evil party get together and do something that is both stupid and evil. In Washington, that is called bipartisanship." Afghanistan - a bipartisan disaster. How can both parties put our good military people through this insanity? Well, they put all of us through this every day - Obamacare, Amnesty, omnibus bills, a borderless welfare state, John McCain and Harry Reid. When will be have a true opposition party? When will we have a party that actually works to restore America?
Jeb Bush being nominated would finally be the catalyst conservatives would need to immediately leave the Republican Party and form a true conservative party. We do not need a monarchy with two competing families, one from the trailer parks and the other from the country club, supplying all the Kings, and Queens. We need good people who understand our Founders, and neither the Bush's or the Clinton's do. Jeb Bush is salivating over the largest possible Amnesty he can help make happen. Clinton simply wants to assume the Tyrant chair from Obama. Please Jeb - run, so we can put the Republican Party out of its misery and create a fresh party that actually believes in the Constitution. The Freedom Party.
No matter how bad Obamacare turns out, no matter how high the rates, no matter how many die because they didn't get an exam because of the $10,000 deductible and requirement they pay 100% till the deductible is satisfied, no matter how awful it is -the Republican Party will do nothing, that is zero, to repeal Obamacare. It would of course be the perfect time right after the election to pass a full repeal bill with at least 70% of Americans detesting this vile "law" which actually makes a joke of the very idea of law. A repeal bill passed would go to Obama. He would of course veto. Then the Senate and the House would have a vote to override. How many Democrats would vote to sustain the veto of the just embarrassed President, for a bill their own constituents hate and will hate even more when the next election rolls around? I think enough would vote to get the repeal done. If not, then the issue is teed up with a clear choice in 2016. But this is too simple and too honest for todays Republican Party, which prefers talk of conservatism to actually doing anything conservative.
Brilliant piece. Above all, do not give the voters any good reason to vote Republican. Don't use the campaign as an opportunity to honestly communicate with voters about what is good about Republicans. Hell, these days there is really nothing good about them except they are not Democrats, and that should be enough. Right? Both Republicans and Democrats believe Obamacare should not be repealed. They have shown that in the last four years. And they both believe in open borders and citizenship for all who get into the country, no matter how. Ask Jeb Bush and John Boehner. And both parties believe in spending money that does not even exist as long as there is no economic calamity and when that happens so be it. I am glad Kurt wrote this column. I was afraid Republicans were going to listen to the angry Tea Party types and actually start promoting out of date ideas like liberty, the Constitution, limited government, respect for the law, punishment for federal workers who violate the rights of citizens, Obamacare for all (every single citizen) or for none. These ideas should not be presented to the people. Just smile and lie and treat the voters like idiots, as if they were politicians or Town Hall writers.
In response to:

We're Living in Depressing Times

Kent147 Wrote: Oct 16, 2014 7:25 AM
The depressing thing is not that Democrats are all working in unison to destroy America. That is obvious but not depressing all by itself. The depressing part is that there is no opposition party seriously confronting the Democrats and their corruption and tyranny. A good man said, 'Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.' Since the Republican Party leadership has decided to be silent in the face of the evil of the Democrats, good people must create other effective ways of fighting evil. A new party that is based on what the Republican Party used to support and defend is needed, now that the Republicans have sold themselves to commercial interests and are no longer in the liberty business.
A lot of words about nothing. Who holds that office is completely meaningless if John Boehner is still the Speaker. A better article would be about a challenge to Boehner from the conservative wing. The challenger would promise to 1) repeal Obamacare, 2) reduce spending, 3) reduce taxes, 4) end agencies that are not needed any longer or required by the Constitution, 5) defund Judges who are operating against the Constitution, 6) defund the IRS since it is operating outside the law, 7) immediately jail Lois Lerner for her utter disregard of the law and her role as a public servant, 8) establish Special Committees with urgent missions to investigate Libya, IRS, Fast and Furious and issue reports to the people within 4 months as these crimes have all been ignored for too long. We need a Congress that represents the people. We presently have a Congress that represent the Government and large corporate interests. We need a radical change or our system of democratic republican government will end. To do this we need John Boehner fired along with his key lieutenants because they are actively working against the people. That would be a crucial race.
In response to:

Ebola

Kent147 Wrote: Oct 13, 2014 7:38 AM
Rich Galen always provides a good bit of humor to start the day. He wants the President who thinks it is a great idea to have people from all third world nations illegally entering the country with zero examination of their health status, the President who employs the CDC Director who stated that "suspending commercial air travel between the US and West African Ebola infected nations" would increase our risk of having the Ebola disease spread - Rich wants this President to convene a "panel of experts" to tell us what to do. Rich, thank you for your cluelessness. It is special.
Michael Barone is a nice man and very polite. He is also extremely naive. Democrat "on defensive". Cut me a break. Across the entire American scene, liberals (mostly Democrats but with lots of Republican support) and erasing American freedoms. These tyrants of both parties are telling us what we can eat, dictating what American manufacturers can produce, what toilet we can sit on, what interest rates banks will pay us for our savings, how we can use our own homes for business purposes, how we are allowed to worship. Basicallly everything. And there is zero Republican Party push back on this - in fact the Republican Party goes out of its way not to oppose anything the Democrats do. Michael - you are out to lunch. Now, go and order whatever Michelle Obama permits Americans to have for lunch.
Paul Greenberg, normally an astute observer, gets this totally wrong. There is no time out. The Supreme Court just told the states - "you can decide this issue, as long as you do not decide to support marriage as it has been understood for the last 2000 years. You can decide as long as you support homosexual marriage. Anything outside of that and we will see you in the woodshed". Paul - your mind is on vacation but your pen is working overtime.
Cal Thomas demonstrates a full lack of any understanding. If the Court were turning the issue back to the states, as he ignorantly suggests, then those states who have created legislation banning gay marriage, clearly and with large majorities supporting, would have their laws in force and secured by this Court action. But the opposite is true. Any state that creates laws using their legal processes and in compliance with their Constitution, that protects traditional marriage, has had their laws overturned by judicial tyrants of the sort that Cal Thomas lauds. Only one outcome is being allowed by the states - and that is the end of marriage. Marriage is henceforth the joining of whatever, and whatever is whatever the most liberal cohort thinks on a given day using immorality as its lodestar. Sorry Cal, you are way off on this one.
Previous 21 - 30 Next