In response to:

The Multitudinous Mitt

Kenneth L. Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 9:07 AM
Paul Ryan came up with a plan to balance the budget someday. I don't remember if it was earlier or later than the time frame you attribute to Romney's plan based on the "nonpartisan" groups analysis (you sound like Andrea Mitchell, always careful to say the "nonpartisan CBO."). You're joking, right? All I've heard from the opposition is that Ryan is out to "gut" essential programs, allow children to starve, etc. Where is the Obama plan? Where is the Democrat budget, and where has it been for the last three fiscal years?
anti-neocon Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 1:55 PM
ryan's pathetic "plan" takes almost 30 years to balance the budget, even under ideal circumstances.

In Wednesday's debate, Mitt Romney said he will "stop the subsidy" to public broadcasting. That's good to know, because Mitt Romney's campaign website says he will merely "reduce subsidies for ... the Corporation for Public Broadcasting."

Kill Big Bird or just pluck some of his feathers? Or neither, in keeping with what often happens to promises made by politicians? As Ted Kennedy once said of Romney's abortion policy, "I am pro-choice. My opponent is multiple choice."

Barack Obama had a tough time in the debate because he was told he would be debating Mitt Romney, a self-described "severely conservative"...