In response to:
rsenewiratne, Robert, John(5507), et al, what exactly is your point? Election fraud is okay?
The evidence is clear, unless somehow you can reason that 100% of a vote going to one candidate is statistically possible, or that there is an explanation for more than 100% of voting age population voting in a district. You guys are nuts.
And if you think it's inconsequential, you're wrong. Al Franken was elected by votes exceeding 100% in a district along with a trunk full of votes found after the counting was complete. And he was the final vote needed to overcome a filibuster and pass Obamacare.
There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep...
Except that guess who's in charge of the Justice Department?