It is impossible for Obaemssiah to imitate Truman. Truman was a member of the KKK. No kidding!

The "underclass," which is very much non-white, is the "underclass" because they have been put there by Progressives --- Wilson, Sanger, LBJ and others. We need conservative leadership for 8+ years (I mean CONSERVATIVE; not necessarily Republican) that will rekindle the American dream and impart its potential to the African-Americans, Hispanics, etc. They have to see that others have done it (especially other non-whites)and so can they. The "Uncle Tom" and "Oreo" concepts have got to be killed for all legal non-white Americans. They HAVE to become a part of the American SUCCESS story and know why they are there. Those who are now successful (except in the Obama administration) know why. If the progressives force them into ghettos...

Lyndon Baines Johnsom "It's better to have them inside the tent pissing out than outside the tent pissing in.

Barone misses one point that could really have clinched his case. When he says that distancing consumers from the cost of healthcare results in anticipated increases in healthcare spending, he ignores one powerful demonstrative example --- company-paid health insurance. Demanded by unions starting in the 1950s, company-paid healthcare insurance immediately distanced the consumer from the costs. Company-paid healthcare, which expanded greatly (largely because of further union demands) pushed up healthcare costs enormously. Yes, increases in population, the aging of the population and advances in more expensive technology have played their role; but not some sort of price-gouging cabal. Yes, we can find another reason to do away with...

Did you know that Stalin declared the age of !2 --- yeas, 12 --- to be the age at which a person could be sentenced to death or life in the Gulag --- which was the same as death for a kid (and most adults, especially seniors). He did this simply becasue it would reduce the number of mouths that the state would have to support.

Take a look at Obamacare --- it does the same thing --- eliminating the weaker young and the elderly through death. (Hitler was much the same.) Stlain - Obama - Hitler: yeah, sounds right.

I can't stop thinking that Obama IS a Muslim, which makes the meeting with the Pope meaningless and puts that pamphlet in the "circular file" without reading.

Isalam does not allow Mankind to be created in the image of God. You can't draw a picture of Mohammed, so why would they allow someone to portray their perception of the Creator, as so many have done in western art throughout the centuries? Show me, please, Islamic art portraying a human being. It does not exist because it is against Sharia law. Visit the estate of Doris Duke, one of the greatest collectors of Islamic art, on Oahu, and show me ONE item depicting a human being. You can't. Therefore, the dignity and the individual and his/her creation in the image of...

--- a fascist, racist hater. I hate racists and fascists. Hmmmm?!?! I wonder where we can find some? The White House! The Democrat Party! The Obama administration! George Soros! (Soros should know all about fascists. He collaborated with the Nazis! Yeah, he turned over Hungarian Jews to the SS. But, according to him, if he didn't do it, somebody else would have.)

And I never thought that Lanny Davis could say something so intelligent.

This remionds me of the famous photo of the Vietnam era showing a South Vietnamese officr putting a pistol to the head of a North Vietnam and pulling the trigger --- evidence of "cruelty" at the hands of the South Vietnamese and their allies (US). The picture is real.

What they don't tell you is that the guy being shot was being summarily executed as a spy. He was a North Vietnamese soldier (officer) in civilian clothing --- making him a spy. Summary courts martial and executions in the field have been carrioed out for centuries and are covered undr the Geneva Conventions. Bu tout marvelous liberal media had to make it otherwise.

I think the comment that the non-inclusion of the pictures in a scholarly work IS "idiotic." On the other hand, nobody really knows what the "Prophet" looked like, so nobody can tell if it was REALLY the "Prophet" in the picture. Why not just insert Brad Pitt's picture in the face and leave everything else the same. On can argue that this is Brad Pitt in ancient Arabic garb that just happens to be what might be a similar representation of a picture of Mohammed.

I'm going to pay $1 million dollars to every African-American for every slave I own and an additional $1 million to each African-American for every day he/she has been in slavery in the USA.

I can't stand the guilt of being a white male of European descent.