In response to:

The Chief Justice of the United States

kenar Wrote: Jun 29, 2012 3:01 PM
Why the Supreme Court’s Arizona ruling, SB 1070, is judicial tyranny ! Make no mistake, our founding fathers have never granted a power to Congress to regulate aliens within the various State borders. What they did grant to Congress is the power to set the requirements by which an alien may become a citizen of the united States. And if there is any dispute concerning the limited power granted to Congress regarding the "Rule of Naturalization", let our founding fathers speak for themselves. Rep White while debating the Rule of Naturalization notes the narrow limits of what “Naturalization” "a power granted to Congress" means, and he doubted whether the US Constitution authorized Congress to say on what terms aliens or citizens should
kenar Wrote: Jun 29, 2012 3:02 PM
hold lands in the respective States;

the power vested by the Constitution in Congress, respecting the subject now before the House, extend to nothing more than making a uniform rule of "Naturalization".

After a person has once become a citizen, the power of congress ceases to operate upon him; the rights and privileges of citizens in the several States belong to those States;

but a citizen of one State is entitled to all the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States,

all therefore, that the House have to do on this subject, is to confine themselves to an uniform rule of "Naturalization",

and not to a general definition of what constitutes the rights of citizenship in the several States.”

Rep Stone concluded that
kenar Wrote: Jun 29, 2012 3:02 PM
the laws and Constitutions of the States and the US Constitution;

would trace out the steps by which they should acquire certain degrees of US citizenship.

Congress may point out a uniform "Rule of Naturalization",

but cannot say what shall be the effect of that "Naturalization", as it respects the particular States.

Congress cannot say that foreigners,"Naturalized", under a general law, shall be entitled to privileges which the States withhold from native citizens.

Congressional Debates, Rule of Naturalization, Feb. 3rd, 1790, pgs, 1152, 1156, 1157

memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llac&fileName=001/llac001.db&recNum=576 - 578 - 579
Just about everyone in Washington was wrong about what the Supreme Court would do yesterday on the Obamacare case. Well, we were sort of right but in the end we were wrong.

First of all the official title of the case is:

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS ET AL. v. SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.

Who knew that? Put your hand down, you didn't know it until today, either.

I, along with everyone else, believed the Court would rule the Individual Mandate to be an Unconstitutional extension...