In response to:

Sarah Palin Calls Nancy Pelosi a Ding-Bat

kenar Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 7:25 PM
hold lands in the respective States; the power vested by the Constitution in Congress, respecting the subject now before the House, extend to nothing more than making a uniform rule of "Naturalization". After a person has once become a citizen, the power of congress ceases to operate upon him; the rights and privileges of citizens in the several States belong to those States; but a citizen of one State is entitled to all the privileges and immunities of the citizens in the several States, all therefore, that the House have to do on this subject, is to confine themselves to an uniform rule of "Naturalization", and not to a general definition of what constitutes the rights of citizenship in the several States.” Rep Stone concluded that,
kenar Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 7:54 PM
And why are any of us accepting-putting-up-with-allowing, any of these Judicial abuses-crimes ?
kenar Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 7:38 PM
Accepted precedents are often unconstitutional when compared to the original USC,

Are they not ?

And why are any of us accepting-putting-up-with-allowing, any of these Judicial crimes ?
08hayabusa Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 7:29 PM
That's why questions to nominees are always about precedent rather than Constitutional Law.

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, the same woman who said we needed to pass ObamaCare to see what's in it, doesn't have a fan in Sarah Palin. The former Alaska governor and vice presidential nominee called Pelosi a "ding-bat" last night on Hannity.

Palin also responded to the ObamaTax ruling on her Facebook page.

Thank you, SCOTUS. This Obamacare ruling fires up the troops as America’s eyes are opened! Thank God.

This proves to...