In response to:

Justice Ginsburg: We Really Need an All-Female Supreme Court

Ken85 Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 3:11 PM
Bill and Hillary's dream come true. Orrin Hatch should've been ousted in the last election cycle. All he does is rubber stamp whatever the lib's want. Ruth Bader Ginsberg was an ACLU attorney. Did any red flags go up? She's stated that she pretty much doesn't follow the Constitution but prefers to look at international law for her decisions. Clearly not the job of a Supreme Court Justice. Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan and Sotmayor are not qualified for the job. Breyer once got mad and stated the Constitution means what he says it means. Obvious conclusion when you examine his logic, or rather his lack of logic.I've been trying to understand who so many loose cannons have made their way into the court. O'Conner, Kennedy, Breyer, and now Roberts
Speaking at a 10th Circuit Bench & Bar Conference at the University of Colorado-Boulder, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she hopes to see an all-female Supreme Court one day. Via CBS:

“Now the perception is, yes, women are here to stay,” Ginsburg told the conference. “And when I’m sometimes asked when will there be enough and I say when there are nine, people are shocked.”

Ginsburg said that no one has “ever raised a question” when nine men were serving on the bench.

Ginsburg added that she felt “lonely” on the bench when she was...

Wednesday, May 22 | 10:26 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 10:26 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 10:26 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 10:26 PM ET