In response to:

Without Deep Spending Cuts, the Republicans Lose the House in 2014

Ken6565 Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 2:02 PM
What they can't do is assume that their position sells itself. They have to have attractive, eloquent spokesmen out there making and showing the point on TV, tough, well-prepared spokesmen who can hand hostile news interviewers (Piers Morgan, Christiane Amanpour, Andrea Mitchell, etc.) their heads.
Stuart95 Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 3:16 PM
I agree, but can't think of anyone attractive to a wide group of voters.

Is Rubio too outspoken and already damaged goods?

Is Paul the real thing? Cruz? Jindal?
Okay, it’s official. According to the Treasury Department, the U.S. debt jumped to $16.1 trillion in 2012 from $14.8 trillion in 2011. That’s a $1.3 trillion deficit for the last year. Remarkable. During President Obama’s first term, the federal debt rose by roughly $6 trillion.
 
Now, if they are bold, House Republicans will take advantage of these dismal numbers. Bold means bold spending cuts, as in cut spending like there’s no tomorrow. Bold means implementing the $1.2 trillion spending sequester. Bold means an absolute rock-solid commitment to spending cuts. A new Rasmussen survey shows that 62 percent of Americans favor across-the-board...
Related Tags: House Republicans