If marriage is so intertwined with religion - as this author argues - then why is the state involved at all? Shouldn't religious institutions be church decisions ?

The entire "cover-up" conspiracy is dependent upon the notion that a terrorist attack on our Embassy would have been hurt Obama at the polls. Where is this belief coming from? I don't think it would have a difference in the election one way or the other. They got it wrong, plain and simple. Terrorists attacked our Embassy and killed 4 Americans. It's not nothing like that has ever happened before. By most counts, there were 11 attacks on US Embassies during Bush's presidency.

Government shouldn't be involved in "marriage" at all. Governments should only regulate civil unions (between both straight and gay couples). Leave "marriage" to churches.

The US Supreme Court was established and authorized under the Constitution to interpret the Constitution. Their opinions are just as valid as the Constitution.

The US Supreme Court was established and authorized under the Constitution to interpret the Constitution. Their opinions are just as valid as the Constitution.

So working for $2 an hour would help unskilled black workers?

So pick any celebrity and use them as examples of "liberals". Should someone put together a list of quotes from Ted Nugent, Limbaugh, Tim McVeigh, Pat Robertson, David Koresh, Joe McCarthy, etc, and title the article "Things Conservatives Believe" ?

Why is it that when a violation of the Establishment Clause is pointed out, people say someone "was offended". Being offended has nothing to do with it. I am not offended in the least by, for example, the 10 Commandments on a courthouse lawn or posted in a public school. But that doesn't change the fact that it's a violation of the Establishment Clause, so I would support efforts to remove it.

oops - I meant: Laws are not meant to enforce morality.

Try Google.