I have to agree with Neale2... What makes you think it's "extremely unlikely" that Obama ordered the government to violate his opponents' rights? That's par for the course for Obama.....

This isn't about courage, Rightstuff, this is about goals. Christians who are willing to stand up for their beliefs are exactly the kind of citizens that Obama ~doesn't~ want here.

Mr. Romeike needs to get himself some viagra and set a steady three-times-a-day schedule. If "anchor babies" are good enough for tuberculosis-carrying drug dealers, they're surely good enough for productive, successful citizens trying to escape anti-Christian persecution.

I only see one mistake in there, Anderson. Christianity is not a "favorite strawman." The entire ~goal~ of the homosexual lobby is to attack Christianity. It's the rhetoric about marriage that's a distraction.

You presume they began with good intentions... I don't. I believe the major impetus for these scholarships and loans was for the colleges, not the students--to funnel more government money into institutions that in turn support the government.

We need school boards who are brave enough to give groups like this the finger. If they're going to take our rights, at least make them work for it!

Exactly. Mr. Ayers conveniently forgets to mention that his group ~tried~ to murder people, but just wasn't competent enough.

And in fact, in places such as the Netherlands where homosexuality is widely accepted, they have the same rate of suicides, depression, drug use, and other symptoms of severe inner conflict. Like the AIDS epidemic, they try to blame this on intolerance, but their lifestyle is plain and simply bad for them.

Purple, I presume, would represent the labor unions--such as the SEIU, who wears purple shirts and is already famous for beatings. The homosexuals, naturally, would therefore be in pink.

Mexico can't get its act together because it doesn't have to. As long as they've got people sending American money to Mexico, they don't have to fix their problems.