In response to:

Same-Sex Marriage Thought Police?

kchoate Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 4:57 PM
When I was a teen, I was kinda intimidated when a couple of gays came onto to me, they were friends and I did my best to extract myself without offending them. As I grew older and entered my career, I became acquainted with the "professional gay" whose characteristics I quickly learned to appreciate. Intelligent, competent, conscientous and helpful. You can't ask for anything more, they were not interested in dating me and we got along well. I am in favor of offering "unions" to gay couples that offer all the benefits as marriage, but not the name. One last thought, this is extremely politically incorrect. Research studies are now indicating a specific gene is related to a individulals sexual orientation. Could this be a genetic disease?
Kevlar Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 5:13 PM
Of homosexual cases, more than half are preventable.
0_BAMANATION Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 5:08 PM
kchoate... read my osts on genetic-homosexualism below.

Homosexuality is definitely genetic based. Worldwide it occurs in but 3% of all humans... never 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 or 100% (which if occurrant in but any of these other foreclosed percentages would have foreclosed survival of our species). It is limited to 3% by genetics which will be confirmed with certainty within but 20 years. Then it will be a race for the cure... either to purge this gene(s)or compel them to do what Neanderthal genes presently do in all humans... not express.

THAT will end the long term nightmare of homosexualism.
Mother of 4 -- the original Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 5:12 PM
One cannot predict scientific results.

We do not know if there is any genetic component to any kind of temptation to sin. We only know that sin is universal in human nature.
Mother of 4 -- the original Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 5:02 PM
Read my discussion with Jeffar lower down the page and answer the questions about why the government should offer the same benefits to people whose living arrangements are neutral toward or negative toward the perpetuation of civilization as it does towards those whose living arrangements favor the continuation of civilization.

Being nice people doesn't equate to deserving special rights.
RG_THP Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 4:59 PM
There is NO proof that Homosexuality is genetic.
0_BAMANATION Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 5:08 PM
... upcoming and within 20 years
kchoate Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 6:50 PM
I am just repeating what I have read and what gays are reporting. As long as you don't come on to me and get in my face, AKA comfort zone, we are cool. That;s what the the whole issue is about.. The Gays are in our face and invading my"comfort zone" and no tolorence for dissent. I have very real issues with this.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Activists would have us believe that the issue of marriage is about the “rights” and “equality” of homosexuals. But in reality, the push to redefine marriage is about demanding public approval and celebration of homosexuality. There is a difference. Slot machines are legal in some areas, but if the COO of Chick-fil-a had expressed a personal disapproval of gambling, would slot-machine supporters have demanded a boycott of his restaurants? What about smokers? Would they have lambasted Dan Cathy for expressing that he personally does not approve of smoking?

No. Because at the end...