Yes, there can be a downside to ever greater government provision. Many things done in the name of compassion—even compassionate conservatism—can have undesirable side effects. In the 1970s, for example, honorable people on both sides of the political divide tried to find ways with coping with persistent poverty. Surely, those who seemed trapped in poverty were living lesser lives. Was there not something...
In response to:
LD, that is exactly what is wrong with liberals thinking, Most Americans do not think like that, and want less government intrusion in their lives, smaller government, less taxes and more freedom to make their own decisions and mistakes. Most Americans live within their means, and have made considerable sacrifices to reduce our personal debt while the feds run wild with spending and failed programs and projects. Now lets talk about socialism. NAZI Germany, NK, the Soviet Union and China. In everyone of these examples the communist leadership live like royalty while the average citizens live in poverty. Take one look at GoogleEarth(TM) at NK and then look at SK and China. Do you see the difference? Americans are not buying your argument!
Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) struck a nerve during his acceptance speech in Tampa, Florida last week. He put his finger on the Obama vision for America and in doing so, may have given Americans a jolt.
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 5 hours ago
- EPA exonerates Christie administration in obscure bridge-related offense someone made up Mary Katharine Ham 5 hours ago
- California energy companies are getting the heck outta’ dodge and moving to Texas Erika Johnsen 6 hours ago
- CNN poll: 58% oppose abortion in most or all cases Ed Morrissey 7 hours ago
- Video: Rand Paul’s very libertarian speech at CPAC Allahpundit 8 hours ago
- RNC Chairman talks tactics, the GOP’s technological gap, and how the March for Life “was a little bit of a wake-up call” Dustin Siggins 9 hours ago