Previous 11 - 20 Next
Actually he is correct that conservatives tend to be better educated, Think about it -it isn't hard to grasp while claiming the left is better educated is laughable on its face. The left is composed largely of lawyers and high school dropouts with not much else in between. They either have a law degree or are lucky to have a GED. Cher, a 10th grade drop out, has the education level of the typical liberal and the typical Hollywood celebrity. Those trained to be dependent on government and believe the promise of a minuscule raise in their government handout is worth their vote are not the well educated in society. The average conservative has at least 2 years of college and is more likely to have 4 years college than have nothing more than a high school diploma. It is what it is.
What is it these idiot celebs don't get? You can't promote peace unless peace is on the agenda of all sides. I suggest they all read Hamas' charter document Covenant of Hamas which lays out its purpose for even existing and its goals. Not only is peace not on their agenda, it is SPECIFICALLY REJECTED. In other words -you can't promote peace when one side has already said there will be no peace and any "peace talks" only served to benefit the infidels pushing them but would never be accepted by Hamas. So those insisting Israel must allow Hamas to exist are pushing the very side that insures the highest number of casualties. You want PEACE -then destroy the ONE group in the way of it, the ONE group that has specifically rejected peace and vowed its only goal is to destroy Israel and kill Jews everywhere - and grind them into dust.
These are people convinced of their own superiority and the pure mobility of their agenda, they believe their ends justifies any means. It exposes the real nature of their agenda in the process and the fact it's core is built on nothing but sheer contempt for the people whom they fully believe are stupid and incapable of making good decisions for themselves. They believe that are fully justified to lie to stupid people then if it deceives them into making the "correct" decision -and of course the "correct" decision is only the one that leaves them as a ruling elite with ever greater power. See how that works? Udall HAD to lie because it was really for our own good. As a Marxist defines "good". They believe they have a right to rule and NOT that they must earn the informed consent of the governed.
These people have really adopted the notion of replacing our system with a Chicago-style thugocracy and make sure we all get any of those icky thoughts about liberty and freedom out of our heads. The idea corporations exist to be "patriotic" could come right out of the Communist Manifesto. They exist to make a profit and if they don't, they disappear. Along with every single job they created in their effort to try and make a profit. The biggest loser every time a business fails is government which loses all the tax revenue it was collecting from every employee in addition to taking corporate money it could not use for R &D, outdated, worn equipment and the creation of even more jobs. I take issue with a backward tax system anyway that discourages productivity, savings and hard work in the first place when one based on consumption would bring in greater revenue and those paying the most would always be the rich who would be doing so voluntarily and not because government was being used as a thief in the belief it somehow cleanses the act of stealing from others.
Government forcing people to violate their religious beliefs is a human rights violation. Apparently some have become so base and so greedy they can only recognize it when other governments do it. Once a people fail to realize real rights are that which protects us FROM government and pretend rights are merely whatever goods and services they happen to covet today and want to demand government force someone else to pay for, the demise of that nation is guaranteed. Its replacement is invariably just another historically proven failed totalitarian state where people can enjoy an existence as state owned property where they need not be burdened with having to run their own life anymore.
In response to:

Martial Law and a Would Be King

KayLJ Wrote: Jul 26, 2014 11:41 AM
The opposite of one totalitarian state is not another one. Right-left is determined by the system of government, not why they want such a system. ALL totalitarianism, all dictatorships, all fascism us left wing extremism. Nazis and communists were both left wing extremists and merely disagreed about who should wield the power. Right wing extremists oppose a massive, powerful government with great control of the individual no matter who wants yo wield that power or why they do. Too far to the right presents a real and/or perceived power void with a state unable to defend itself and protect its citizens. Leftists are quick to exploit that void to their advantage and of course leftists always insist they will use all that government power to do all sorts of touchy-feely things -but unlike wealth, power is a finite pie and their real game is conning we the people into voluntarily forfeiting more of our power and shifting it to the state. History has repeatedly warned this same pattern continues until a critical tipping point is reached when they can just grab the rest. Evil Harry Reid's proposed amendment to gut the 1st Amendment is one of the rawest power grabs imaginable. It is a bill that would give incumbents -those IN power-the right to limit the media access of their own challengers and control what voters are allowed to even HEAR. Then lies through his teeth insisting this is necessary so the voices of others aren't drowned out. Controlling what government wants me to HEAR protects no one but government aka as INCUMBENTS and those IN government. Democrats, now under the control of far leftwing extremists have put a bullseye on our Bill of Rights and if Americans are stupid enough to let the powerful finish draining what's left of OUR power, then we deserve what's coming. But our children and grandchildren who have no choice but blindly trust us to do the right thing sure don't.
It isn't Christians doing it -assuming it is so is your own anti-Christian bias. Secondly while 64% of the French are of Roman Catholc heritage, only 2.9% actually practice the religion-less than the percent of French who practice Islam. Catholics support Israel and it isn't those practicing Catholics rioting, threatening Jews and vandalizing their property in France. So..wanna take another bigoted stab at pretending its Christians doing this -or face the facts?
No Republicans put anything in the ACA so let's not re-write history here. Democrats 100% OWNERS of the ACA. The ACA was drawn up and written without ANY Republican input, they were NOT consulted, not asked for even an opinion and as a direct result it was passed with ZERO Republican votes. It was opposed by the majority in the country then, opposed by even more now. The ACA is Democrats giving Americans the middle finger as they rammed unwanted legislation down the throats of all Americans while lying through their teeth about it in the greatest display of career politician arrogance I've ever seen in my life. Democrats want to segregate us by groups and then pit groups against each other as they buy votes by promising one group they will steal money from the other groups and give it to them. Now Democrats want to amend the First Amendment in order to give incumbents an even greater advantage and limit media access of their own challengers. Oh, under the pretense that if incumbents control what voters are allowed to hear at election time, this protects YOUR "free speech". Of course if Republicans controlled 2/3 of government they would "suddenly" recognize it as the raw power grab it is -and nothing more. Anyone who believes the Democrats want to re-write the Bill of Rights to protect we the people and we've been doing it all wrong for 200+ years -deserves to be the government owned slave Democrats are trying to make of us all.
In response to:

The Coming Christian Revolt

KayLJ Wrote: Jul 21, 2014 9:59 AM
Interesting you suddenly turned so irrational as to even reject reality. Liberalism is rooted in a rejectin of human nature and the insane belief liberals are so...noble and all they can remake the species and force an evolution of our species into something they are not. Every single person who has taken a gun and committed mass murder in this country since the Civil War has been either a left wing extremist or mentally ill. That's a fact and if you understood human nature as it really is instead of what you need tompretend it is, you'd know why. Not one conservative, not one Tea Partier. And if you understood human nature as it really is instead of what you need tompretend it is, you'd quickly pick up on the reason why the right aren't the mass murderers in this country. They don't believe killing total strangers furthers their desire for limited, decentralized and more accountable government. Period. If someone believes government should have LESS power, why commit the one act most likely to result in government grabbing MORE power? But leftists know mass murder is more likely to result in what THEY want -massive, powerful government with great control of the individual. Left wing extremism is totalitarianism -ALL forms of totalitarianism, dictatorships and fascism are left wing extremism. (Left-right is determined by the system of government sought, not the reasons why the do.). Nazis and communists are both left wing extremists and merely disagree about who should wield that power, The opposite of one totalitarian government is not another one. The right opposes allowing a government to gain the size and power to be totalitarian -no matter who wants to wield the power or why. I'm older and wiser now and realize the most humane, greatest benefit to our species is small, limited, decentralized power in a government that is held accountable by we the people. I'd rather be dead than be a leftist. The horrific thing is leftists would rather I be dead too.
Gee, I guess his health wasn't so "critical" after all. Gee, I wonder if FDR would have traded one deserter for 5 top level Nazis during WWll.
In response to:

The Wrong Type of Values

KayLJ Wrote: Jul 04, 2014 9:50 AM
None will leave -this was never the female Hobby Lobby employees demanding government force the Greens foot their bill for 4 abortion pills. This was entirely the demand of the power hungry left running government. Maybe because their female employees think it is more than offset by the fact their employers pay well above minimum wage, promote from within, had a generous health insurance package that covered 16 out of 20 birth control pills long before Obamacare was around, keeps hours and employee work schedules that respects and benefits their family life and makes sure they are actually able to spend time with their families - and find that to be more than a fair trade-off. If employer-paid abortion drugs tops your list of priorities for a job, the answer is easy -go apply somewhere where it isn't an issue for the employer. We figured out how respect the religious rights of others even when we didn't share those beliefs centuries ago and now the left insists it really means forcing the religious to live by their (non) beliefs instead.
Previous 11 - 20 Next