1 - 10 Next
Franken has the same organization in place to steal the next election as well -he's not concerned. But it does confirm my belief you have to have a single digit IQ to live in Minnesota.
Libertarians are nuts if they think they are going to force a change in direction from the top down. It doesn't work that way, never has. Get control at the local and state levels, giving you greater say and power at the federal level. Change must come from the base up. And until your side has gained enough power within the party to actually influence the direction of the party -you hold your nose and vote for the lesser of two evils come elections. You do it for the good if the nation, which should always come before party interests! Are we better off with a Marxist in the White House golfing while the world is on fire? Are we better off with the man who mocked Romney for having a far, far better grasp and far better read in the world? Are we better off because you libertarians decided to punish the entire nation because the candidate who won the nomination wasn't your personal choice -although infinitely more qualified for the job than BO? ARE YOU SERIOUS? If anything, reading this infuriated me. You may be smugly patting yourself on the back for punishing the party by refusing to vote for Romney but you proved you were willing to cause permanent, lasting damage to the nation itself, damage from which we truly may never recover -and for that, I have no respect and no desire to reward either.
In response to:

Ted Cruz's Speech to Arab Christians

KayLJ Wrote: Sep 16, 2014 10:58 AM
Trying to get a people persecuted and despised for their faith to take a good, long look in the mirror about the fact they are guilty of doing to Jews what they denounce as inhumane when done to them -is not obscuring the issue whatsoever. Do not ask for my help with ending your persecution then turn around and justify your participation in the identical persecution of others and for the very same reasons you are bring persecuted.
The difference is how other Baptists and Muslims react to these two. Every Christian denomination has publicly denounced the Westboro "Church" as not representative of Christian principles no matter what denomination they claim to be. Westboro is a "church" in name only and managed to fulfill the minimum requirements to register as a church -but in reality is just a cult of all family members. Westboror Church as a lone cult in a sea of Christians who have no problem denouncing them -and uses WORDS and printed signs as part of their campaign to try and convince others of their "righteousness". That's it -they SAY things we don't like and other Christians in particular openly disagree with. They have no global recognition any more than any other bunch of loons Christians readily recognize is no part of Christianity no matter what label they choose for themselves. Now compare that to ISIS (Obama insists on calling it ISIL hoping to duck blame for the fact this is the very same group the US was supporting and arming in Syria) which uses terror, mass murder, beheadings etc in the name of THEIR religion. As with any other Islamofascist terrorist group -as long as they announce their real enemy is the West, muslims around the world are SILENT because their religion gives them no other option. Their religion SPECIFICALLY tells them in any conflict between muslims and non-muslims, allah is always on the side of muslims so their support must also be with them. You will never hear global condemnation and even when islamic leaders are put on the spot by reporters demanding to know if they support these terrorist actions -they weasel out of giving a yes or no answer and instead twist it back insisting the very question is promoting and indicative of nothing but "islamophobia". But they never condemn it, they don't say these people are not carrying out the teachings of islam and don't represent the beliefs of muslims. Because they ARE and all muslims know it. Islam is nothing but a game plan for amassing power here on earth and the blue print for doing it while keeping the group under rigid control -in the guise of a religion. Those trying to compare ISIS to an outcast FAMILY using words but unsupported by any but themselves are either morally bankrupt or have a hidden agenda by trying to convince others these two are one and the same thing when that is an easily proven lie.
When a group or nation has declared war, those in a foreign country assisting them are part of the war. If they were still in the US, they can be charged and executed for treason but if a US citizens goes to another country in order to assist our enemy in their war against us or our allies, different story. This is asymmetrical war, but it is still war. If Americans choose to join forces with our enemy in another country, they made a legitimate military target of themselves as combatants and it doesn't matter whether they use a gun, a computer, work to recruit others or are raising money for them. The support system that keeps enemy forces up and running are always a legitimate military target. The fact they went to another country to assist them changes it from treason which requires a trial in criminal court to an enemy combatant and becomes a legitimate military target who happens to have a US passport on him. All this does is render that passport useless and means you cannot leave the country in order to wage war against the US or its allies then turn around and claim the protections of that same government. That should have been law already -you leave the country to wage war against us, you cannot simultaneously demand it protect you.
I have to wonder about the IQ of anyone who thinks respecting and encouraging "diversity" is stifling free speech because it doesn't conform with someone's personal choices. What happened was a demand by one for others to conform to her own personal beliefs. Do not kid yourselves -free speech and diversity are not muslim values, expecting others to conform and accept their definition of "acceptable" is. There is a reason there is no mention of a "right to never be offended" in the Bill of Rights. Getting offended by something is a CHOICE, we CHOOSE to be offended. Personally I CHOOSE to reserve feeling offended when offense was actually intended. And even then, demanding others must have their rights restricted because I CHOSE to be offended is never in the table. If you can't accept American values and grasp what is meant by "liberty for ALL", perhaps you are in the wrong country. If that offends you -too bad.
My life expectancy is significantly longer in the hands of one as a non-Jew and non-muslim.
I think he will be put on trial and if so, I hope he is acquitted. Whether people can face facts or not, Brown attacked Wilson by shoving him back in his car and punched him, resulting in a blow-out fracture of his orbit -the bones that support and hold the eyeball in place in the skull. He attempted to shoot Wilson with his own gun and apparently claim to have proof Brown had his hands on that gun -probably Brown's prints on the gun. There are witnesses backing up Wilson's version of events about Brown ignoring Wilson's order to freeze and instead charging him. One said he was sure Wilson had been missing him because nothing fazed Brown until the head shot dropped him 2-3 feet in front of the cop. No word on the Tox report which may help understand Brown's behavior but after seeing how he used his size and strength to intimidate the much smaller convenience store clerk and smashed the cop's orbital bones, calling Brown a "gentle giant" is a sick joke at best. I'm waiting for the day people understand why the publuc is urged to wait for the complete investigation instead of this mob mentality and assuming everything worth knowing is already known. No, it wasn't. Both Brown and Wilson have a right to a full independent investigation free from interference from out of control mobs and internal pressures to come to a prejudged result. The irony is after blacks had been so often the victims of lynchings in the past, many were demanding the lynching of Wilson. If your kid doesn't know how to avoid being shot by a cop, now would be a good time to let them in on the secret -and point by point let them know what Brown did every step of the way that only kept increasing the likelihood he would be shot -until there was no other option left.
If they make unsubstantiated comments like that then the next time someone can use that as a source that "proves" it is true. That's how it works -make a bold claim without a shred of evidence to support it and as put it out there as if it is a given just as much as "the sun rises every morning". Then they use each others' statements as proof in the future when they repeat their claim. And never once back it up but ends up accepted as "fact" by the intellectually bankrupt. Simple. First rule of Marxism and endorsed by that scum sucking bottom feeder Saul Alinsky-if you repeat a lie often enough, it will be believed. You use the lie put out there by another person to back up your own repetition of the lie and claim it proves it is true. They come out like cockroaches when trying to get a lie accepted as "fact" and must be stomped each time before it reproduces. Lying as a political tool to manipulate and deceive people is a main staple in the Democrat arsenal -they are the ones who think their agenda is just so...noble-y and all, their ends justifies the means.
In response to:

The Ferguson Feeding Frenzy

KayLJ Wrote: Aug 20, 2014 11:15 AM
Those who saw a dead black and an alive white cop wanted to leap to conclusions by assuming facts not in evidence and did so for their own agenda. Michael Brown attacked the cop, shoved him back into his car where he proceeded to shatter Wilson's eye socket and nearly shot him with his own gun. When a dazed Wilson started to give chase yelling "freeze-freeze" and Brown chose to turn around and charge him instead, there should be no surprise Brown was shot. The myth being fed is that white cops are frequently shooting blacks and it is false. Part of the reason this blew up is because it so rarely happens and is NOT routine. But it turns out that just like nearly every other time a cop shoots and kills someone, anyone with even a marginal IQ can identify what the individual did to insure they would be shot. And I can with Brown too and as resistant as some are to dealing with reality, so can everyone else. If your kid doesn't know how to avoid getting shot by a cop, this would be a great time to let them in on the secret.
1 - 10 Next