1 - 10 Next
Isn't it AMAZING and AWESOME for Democrats that "calibration errors" ALWAYS end up in error in their favor and only affect votes cast for Republicans and turn them into Democrat votes! And it happens in different states and different polling places and it happens several times in every single election. (The ones that get discovered.) I have never once heard of the opposite happening with "calibration errors". NOT ONCE. Which tells anyone with a double digit IQ or higher that this is not an error whatsoever. For those who still had any doubt, the corrupt Democrat machine now has elections so rigged their opponents can't win office by winning a mere majority. They have to win a super majority in order to first overcome the stuffed ballot boxes, fraudulent mail-ins, rigged machines as well as all the illegals and dead voting several times.
The definition of terrorism is not "whatever causes terror" nor do you want it changed to be all inclusive so that everyone everywhere is guilty of terrorism because undoubtedly no matter what, one can claim something another did scared them and therefore they are "terrorists". Words have meaning and not fluid definitions that mean whatever we need them to mean at the moment and tomorrow it means whatever we want it mean then. Terrorism is the deliberate targeting of civilians for murder in the name of a political agenda. Period. Anything else has a different name which in no way implies somehow less egregious or evil. Terrorism is actually a poor tool for war since it deprives the enemy of no weapons and no soldiers and therefore serves no valid military purpose. It is typically the tool used by a sharply weaker enemy because killing civilians doesn't defeat another military. Hasan didn't target civilians, he targeted unarmed military personnel, something that did deprive his enemy of needed personnel and soldiers -he committed treason and murder. But that was NOT work place violence and it was not an act of terrorism even though he had the identical politicoreligious agenda as those who do commit terrorism.
Kool aid drinker.
In response to:

Why Beheading?

KayLJ Wrote: Sep 23, 2014 9:32 AM
There is no such thing as a moderate muslim and we play a losing game pretending there are and they somehow support infidels against their own when THAT is specifically forbidden. But there are billions of naive "infidels" who actually belueve islam is similar to Judaism and Christianity when that is like saying cancer is comparable to apple pie and chocolate cake. The percentage of extremist muslims is roughly 25%. That is roughly equal to the population of the United States. The other 75% pray for their success in every mosque around the world. There aren't three conflicts occurring in the world today that Islamofascism isn't at the root of that conflict. And muslims pray for their success in every mosque around the world. Islam was designed by a sociopath for sociopaths to feel good about being an inhumane sociopath.
Franken has the same organization in place to steal the next election as well -he's not concerned. But it does confirm my belief you have to have a single digit IQ to live in Minnesota.
Libertarians are nuts if they think they are going to force a change in direction from the top down. It doesn't work that way, never has. Get control at the local and state levels, giving you greater say and power at the federal level. Change must come from the base up. And until your side has gained enough power within the party to actually influence the direction of the party -you hold your nose and vote for the lesser of two evils come elections. You do it for the good if the nation, which should always come before party interests! Are we better off with a Marxist in the White House golfing while the world is on fire? Are we better off with the man who mocked Romney for having a far, far better grasp and far better read in the world? Are we better off because you libertarians decided to punish the entire nation because the candidate who won the nomination wasn't your personal choice -although infinitely more qualified for the job than BO? ARE YOU SERIOUS? If anything, reading this infuriated me. You may be smugly patting yourself on the back for punishing the party by refusing to vote for Romney but you proved you were willing to cause permanent, lasting damage to the nation itself, damage from which we truly may never recover -and for that, I have no respect and no desire to reward either.
In response to:

Ted Cruz's Speech to Arab Christians

KayLJ Wrote: Sep 16, 2014 10:58 AM
Trying to get a people persecuted and despised for their faith to take a good, long look in the mirror about the fact they are guilty of doing to Jews what they denounce as inhumane when done to them -is not obscuring the issue whatsoever. Do not ask for my help with ending your persecution then turn around and justify your participation in the identical persecution of others and for the very same reasons you are bring persecuted.
The difference is how other Baptists and Muslims react to these two. Every Christian denomination has publicly denounced the Westboro "Church" as not representative of Christian principles no matter what denomination they claim to be. Westboro is a "church" in name only and managed to fulfill the minimum requirements to register as a church -but in reality is just a cult of all family members. Westboror Church as a lone cult in a sea of Christians who have no problem denouncing them -and uses WORDS and printed signs as part of their campaign to try and convince others of their "righteousness". That's it -they SAY things we don't like and other Christians in particular openly disagree with. They have no global recognition any more than any other bunch of loons Christians readily recognize is no part of Christianity no matter what label they choose for themselves. Now compare that to ISIS (Obama insists on calling it ISIL hoping to duck blame for the fact this is the very same group the US was supporting and arming in Syria) which uses terror, mass murder, beheadings etc in the name of THEIR religion. As with any other Islamofascist terrorist group -as long as they announce their real enemy is the West, muslims around the world are SILENT because their religion gives them no other option. Their religion SPECIFICALLY tells them in any conflict between muslims and non-muslims, allah is always on the side of muslims so their support must also be with them. You will never hear global condemnation and even when islamic leaders are put on the spot by reporters demanding to know if they support these terrorist actions -they weasel out of giving a yes or no answer and instead twist it back insisting the very question is promoting and indicative of nothing but "islamophobia". But they never condemn it, they don't say these people are not carrying out the teachings of islam and don't represent the beliefs of muslims. Because they ARE and all muslims know it. Islam is nothing but a game plan for amassing power here on earth and the blue print for doing it while keeping the group under rigid control -in the guise of a religion. Those trying to compare ISIS to an outcast FAMILY using words but unsupported by any but themselves are either morally bankrupt or have a hidden agenda by trying to convince others these two are one and the same thing when that is an easily proven lie.
When a group or nation has declared war, those in a foreign country assisting them are part of the war. If they were still in the US, they can be charged and executed for treason but if a US citizens goes to another country in order to assist our enemy in their war against us or our allies, different story. This is asymmetrical war, but it is still war. If Americans choose to join forces with our enemy in another country, they made a legitimate military target of themselves as combatants and it doesn't matter whether they use a gun, a computer, work to recruit others or are raising money for them. The support system that keeps enemy forces up and running are always a legitimate military target. The fact they went to another country to assist them changes it from treason which requires a trial in criminal court to an enemy combatant and becomes a legitimate military target who happens to have a US passport on him. All this does is render that passport useless and means you cannot leave the country in order to wage war against the US or its allies then turn around and claim the protections of that same government. That should have been law already -you leave the country to wage war against us, you cannot simultaneously demand it protect you.
I have to wonder about the IQ of anyone who thinks respecting and encouraging "diversity" is stifling free speech because it doesn't conform with someone's personal choices. What happened was a demand by one for others to conform to her own personal beliefs. Do not kid yourselves -free speech and diversity are not muslim values, expecting others to conform and accept their definition of "acceptable" is. There is a reason there is no mention of a "right to never be offended" in the Bill of Rights. Getting offended by something is a CHOICE, we CHOOSE to be offended. Personally I CHOOSE to reserve feeling offended when offense was actually intended. And even then, demanding others must have their rights restricted because I CHOSE to be offended is never in the table. If you can't accept American values and grasp what is meant by "liberty for ALL", perhaps you are in the wrong country. If that offends you -too bad.
1 - 10 Next