1 - 3
I hope Kurt is right; but I fear complacency. **Our** passion for the Constitution-as-written and for the Bill of Rights needs to confront every gun-grabber, and indeed every waffler on the issue, preferably publicly with repeated use of factually correct sound bites insisting that the proposed law(s) would not have stopped past murders and will not stop future "gun violence" until they target criminals rather than honest, law-abiding gun owners. "Show us progress in Chicago/WashingtonDC/etc. before restricting 100 million honest, law-abiding gun owners nationwide." And actively oppose retention of background-check gun-owner/seeker WITH STIFF PENALTIES FOR ANYONE COOPERATING WITH SUCH RETENTION.
In response to:

Mitt Romney Addresses Libya

kagnumushin Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 2:33 PM
typo: should have been spelled "unthinking thug"
In response to:

Mitt Romney Addresses Libya

kagnumushin Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 1:34 PM
i'm not sure there are any "libs" who .... "are not rabid liberal, idol-worshipping drones," as you put it. that is, the ones i encounter personally or online or in media give ground only where they absolutely must (which for most means "never") and then immediately return to some mixture of moral relativism, let's apologize, bash-America-first, and "anyone who disagrees with Obama or Democrats is an unthingking thug who is one or more or all of "racist, reactionary, warmonger, militarist, rich opportunist, islamophobe, homophobe, ..." etc. .... always ignoring the instinctual fascist/totalitarian attitudes-&-policies of their media/hollywood/politician favorites .... which at a rational level would be hilarious were it not so tragic-
1 - 3