In response to:

Justice Ginsburg: We Really Need an All-Female Supreme Court

Kachina27284 Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 6:39 PM
You know that you have a problem when the people that are supposed to stand for equal justice for all is concerned about the court's gender representation. Shouldn't they be able to ensure justice regardless of gender balance on the court?
RockerbabefromGeorgia Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 5:26 PM
And, since when as justice for women ever been the court's aim? Lilly Ledbetter was a good example of idiocy. When it comes to justice for women, often the court is one big failure.
Lance8762 Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 7:18 PM
The very reason those posing the questions during a nomination hearing better have it together, and skip the BS about how overjoyed they are that the nominee graced the committee with their presence.

What a croak!
Speaking at a 10th Circuit Bench & Bar Conference at the University of Colorado-Boulder, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she hopes to see an all-female Supreme Court one day. Via CBS:

“Now the perception is, yes, women are here to stay,” Ginsburg told the conference. “And when I’m sometimes asked when will there be enough and I say when there are nine, people are shocked.”

Ginsburg said that no one has “ever raised a question” when nine men were serving on the bench.

Ginsburg added that she felt “lonely” on the bench when she was...