In response to:

The Republican Rape Dilemma

jwhite218 Wrote: Oct 27, 2012 7:34 PM
I admit that I have had trouble remembering which man was the one who made the really awful and very dumb remark that if a woman was raped in" a legitimate rape" her body would not allow her to get pregnant. That was Mr. Akin. Mourdock is a good man. It seems that both men are good men. Holding fast to their belief. I respect that. I also note that more men, just as is this author of the above article is a man, has never had to actually face a pregnancy from rape or incest or the potential death if pregnant- and that is unfortunate since it causes a mental block from the men who are trying to be fair as well as hold Christian values.

As Richard Mourdock’s Indiana Senate fate hinges on how voters absorb his views on rape, all conservatives have an opportunity for a look in the mirror.

Just how pro-life do we want to be?

The Mourdock controversy is nothing like Todd Akin’s self-inflicted wound in Missouri, the result of an embrace of just plain bad medical information.

Mourdock is in hot water for accurately (if not particularly skillfully) articulating what God instructs about the life of the unborn.

If he is on politically shaky ground, it is because he had the courage to stand on the...