1 - 10 Next
We are watching the socialist state run media system in full operating mode as we move toward a critical election. Rise up against the Democrats and tell your GOP senator that RINOs will not be tolerated. Vote for Tea Party citizen representatives.
In response to:

Race-Based Justice

jwarrior Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 1:34 AM
Sad Denny, You still fail to understand you do not direct, deflect, or control this discussion. You fail continually to face the facts I presented. You still have not refuted any of those facts. You continue to spew the mindless talking points in your vain attempt to deflect the conversation to your spew. Sorry there Denny, Ask your talking point questions to someone that does not understand your old soros drone tactics. Not accepted here. Eventually you may learn that liberals no longer control the media, the message, the wording, the labels. Those days passed away with the last century. Just as your ideology continues to fail and will always fail. Hopefully we will see the end of your ideology in this century.
In response to:

Race-Based Justice

jwarrior Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 1:27 AM
Denny, I notice that you continue to spew the irrelevant allegations and typical soros drone agitator feeble points. You continue to try your deflection from the facts that I presented and I will continue to tell you that your old playbook tactics are not accepted and will not work here. You have a real problem with facts just which stems from the inherent intellectual dishonesty of your socialist ideology. You may well be past the point of comprehension of anything other than your spoon fed talking points. But that will never change the facts. As for answering your questions. Again the typical old worn out tactics of deflection and controlling the language, the labels, is not accepted here. just saying you have no facts of treated for a puffy face. That is another allegation When the facts are presented then you may speak about puffy faces, and sweet gentle giants, "altercations, roughing up" Strong arm robbery is not an altercation or roughing up. The facts remain the facts. And the questions I presented for future determination remain valid in comparing the two principles of M brown and Officer Wilson. You continue to deny the facts as drivel. Oh sad liberal, your feeble attempts continue to show you have yet to learn that your liberal spew is not relevant to the facts.
In response to:

Race-Based Justice

jwarrior Wrote: Aug 22, 2014 5:47 PM
Denny, You just cannot speak to the facts. You continue to try and deflect to your own dialogue which is fine for ABC, and the rest of your buddies in the muddy water media. Once again Denny you must deal with the facts. And no you do not get to control the labels or the facts. He is not a sweet teenage boy. The police did not get a puffy face, You must stick to the facts. Brown is a criminal. He is 6foot 4 with approx 292 pounds of violence prone tendencies. He had committed an act of strong armed robbery and had the adrenaline and marijuana in his blood stream. He was confronted by an authority figure that he had just proven on video tape to resolve to his satisfaction with physical violence. Stick to the facts there Denny. You continue to try and insert your allegations into the waters you so lovingly muddy with pallid feeble focus group selected wording. Sorry there Denny. Not accepted here.
In response to:

Race-Based Justice

jwarrior Wrote: Aug 22, 2014 4:28 PM
Try as you might you cannot argue against facts. The facts are as I stated them. You might try to parse the definition of what legally matters in your attempt to deflect from the facts but that is not accepted here. Was Brown a criminal? Yes, Was Brown confronted by the officer while Brown was still "high" from adrenaline and pot at the time of the confrontation? Was Brown prone to physically assault those who confronted him? Yes, He had just been video taped assaulting a shop keeper during his robbery moments before he was confronted by Officer Wilson. We can argue the allegations all day long. What you cannot argue is the facts that I have stated that led up to and existed through the incident. I know you would love to play the allegations game but that is simply not accepted here. As so many liberals love to say, you are entitled to your own opinion. You are not entitled to your own facts. Stick to the facts and you will find the legal basis that will be applied along with the other facts as they are documented. Example: Direction of the bullets in relation to allegations of shot in the back, shot in the front.. Those facts will be applied to the determination of LEGAL guilt or innocence of charges. The facts stated show Brown to be a criminal. The facts show Brown to be a violent man that used his physical size and aggression to achieve his criminal objectives. The facts show Brown was emotionally charged and chemically charged. The facts show that officer Wilson was not prone to use his firearm to shoot or engage the public at any time. You may wish to bring allegations and employ the distraction and deflection from the facts to support your allegations of bias in the law but once more I admonish you that you cannot argue the facts as I have stated them. You are not entitled to decide what is and is not relevant to the death and your perception of preconceived guilt. Of course you wish to exclude facts that do not support your agenda. Sorry there Denny, Not going to work here.
In response to:

Race-Based Justice

jwarrior Wrote: Aug 22, 2014 3:38 PM
Such a sad liberal attempt to deny the facts, deflect from the facts. You really need to get a new playbook. Yours is worn out and of course never worked when facing an ideological opponent that understands the facts. The issue is that M brown was killed. What led up to the incident? We know the result. So we again go back to the list of facts that you so desperately wish to deny and deflect from. Sorry Not going to accept your feeble attempt.
In response to:

Race-Based Justice

jwarrior Wrote: Aug 22, 2014 2:52 PM
Facts are tough for liberals to deal with. They have to fall back on their old playbook of ignore the facts, sidestep the facts, distract from the facts, and then just deny the facts. Fact: M brown committed strong arm robbery minutes prior to being shot. Fact: M brown was emotionally charged (adrenaline does that for the criminal and the victim) from his successful robbery. Fact: M brown was confronted by a police officer to remove himself from the middle of the street. Fact: M brown assaulted the police officer. Fact: M brown was shot and killed by a police officer that had never shot anyone or at anyone in his career as a police officer. Fact: M brown had traces of an illegal narcotic in his system at the time of his death. More facts will be made public as an investigation proceeds. Facts to look for. How many crimes has M brown been charged with in his life? How many crimes has M brown been convicted of in his life? How many crimes has Officer Wilson been charged with in his life? How many deaths has Officer Wilson been charged with in his life? What Crimes has M brown been charged with? What Crimes has Officer Wilson been charged with? What Crimes has Officer Wilson been convicted of? What crimes have the witnesses been convicted of? How many black on black crimes has Holder assigned an equal or greater number of agents to in his time as Attorney General. How many times has Holder publicly spoken out in defense of white officers involved in arrest of black defendants? Just food for thought.
In response to:

No Facts, No Peace

jwarrior Wrote: Aug 22, 2014 2:22 PM
Local St. Louis sources said Wilson suffered an “orbital blowout fracture to the eye socket.” This comes from a source within the Prosecuting Attorney’s office and confirmed by the St. Louis County Police. dimsleydale.
In response to:

No Facts, No Peace

jwarrior Wrote: Aug 22, 2014 2:20 PM
Eric the correctmenot . Seems to me you should spend a little more time researching facts before trying to develop your own armchair Monday quarterback theories from the safety of your mothers basement. I will be happy to correct you on several of your delusional points. The point of entry and exit do not need clothing as key evidence to determine that MB was not shot in the back. The point about the fractured eye socket has been confirmed through multiple local sources. Local St. Louis sources said Wilson suffered an “orbital blowout fracture to the eye socket.” This comes from a source within the Prosecuting Attorney’s office and confirmed by the St. Louis County Police. While you love to smear conservatives with the same material Tawana Brawley and Al your hero Harpyton use perhaps you should MOVE ON and pick up your paycheck from Soros this week with a promise to do better next time.
Where is Holder on the Federal investigation of the 400 police officers killed in the line of duty over the past year?
1 - 10 Next