In response to:

Stupidity Laws Could Have Stopped Obama

JW94 Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:03 PM
This is a good article until you point to the good judgement of the House Repubicans.
lemmi Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:12 PM
Good judgement may be relative, compared to the Senate and White House the house republicans look like economic Einsteins.
MoreFreedom Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:33 PM
True enough, but when the RINOs in the House could have forced Obama to balance the budget last year by not raising the debt ceiling, they raised it for promises of future spending reductions (with spending increasing every year and deficits as far as we can see).

The reality is most of our GOP representatives aren't fiscally conservative, in spite of their rhetoric. Even 2/3 of the Tea Party representatives elected in 2010 just recently voted to keep the corporate welfare of the Export Import Bank. The GOP is trying to co-opt the fiscal conservatives, claiming they are fiscally conservative then they turn around and spend on waste and welfare. They need to be kicked out in the primaries for lying to voters.
lemmi Wrote: May 22, 2012 3:52 PM

Democrats have been crying for the last few weeks because the official bank of the Obama administration, JPMorgan Chase, lost $2 billion dollars in a hedging strategy that will likely get a few more folks fired from the firm.

Democrats have used their deepest Vox Populi to decry loose bank regulations that allowed this outrage to happen.

Their argument would be especially good if the bank regulations they are criticizing weren’t the result of large Democrat majorities and signed into law by President Occupy Wall Street himself just as the Democrat majorities unwound.

As Reuters notes “The 2010...

Related Tags: Obama Laws
Tuesday, June 18 | 03:56 AM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 03:56 AM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 03:56 AM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 03:56 AM ET