In response to:

Romney at the Bat

justwannasay Wrote: Dec 30, 2012 3:29 PM
Yes - It was another foolish attempt to buy votes with tax money which increased the power and influence of the federal government Now my question to you: Bush increased spending on entitlements, Bush used 9-11 to institute changes that challenged personal privacy, Bush lead the country into war in Afghan. and Iraq. However, BO increased spending even more than Bush, BO went to war in Libya without congress approval, BO is using Obamacare to challenge religious freedom rights ---- Why do lib/prog/dems hate Bush, because he didn't take the wrong actions far enough??? Please answer yes or no!
With humble apologies to Ernest Lawrence Thayer, who wrote "Casey at the Bat," which was published in The San Francisco Examiner in 1888.

The outlook wasn't brilliant for the GOP this year:

The economy had tanked; hope and change had morphed to fear.

The strong and swift refused to join the presidential race.

So the weak and doubtful rose -- and tried to take their place.

Our Herman Cain, for instance, flogged his taxing 9-9-9.

To 10 parts cuts but 1 part tax, all said that they'd decline.

Newt brought his wife, who wore her hair as if it were a hat.

Forget the freak show, sages...