In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

Just an old soldier... Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 4:14 PM
Big difference between liberty and licentiousness. With liberty comes responsibility. Unfortunately for America we are loaded with amoral citizens like yourself. The freak show that is San Francisco is wrong and has nothing to do with individual liberty.
Barbara1247 Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 4:19 PM
The responsibility that comes with liberty is to refrain from causing harm to persons and property.
Blutone79 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 4:46 PM
So a belief that is different than your own narrow view is "amoral" I think you meant "immoral" which I am not. Many countries that have a more liberal stance on nudity tend to have more educated citizens, less crime and more wealth than the U.S.

If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity
Friday, May 24 | 05:50 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 05:50 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 05:50 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 05:50 PM ET