In response to:

Eddie Haskell Brooks

Jude in CT Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 8:15 AM
My husband, (who is no liberal) likes Newshour. It's the one thing I wish I could change about him. We watch the 2nd half, after Jeopardy. I usually have to leave the room duing the "analysis of Shields and Brooks". When I do watch it, it's hard to tell the difference between them.
pascagoulapappy Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 11:04 PM
Shields is the little fat Irishman who stutters, repeats phrases endlessly, and never finishes a sentence, and Brooks is the fat balding Jew who grins and speaks nonsense. Abbott and Costello they ain't.
Kali_Fred Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 9:10 AM
Any you stay married to the lug??
thinker7 Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 8:36 AM
ask him to go to Youtube and type "Larry Sinclair"
Quintus Tullius Cicero Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 8:19 AM
The reason that " it's hard to tell the difference between them," is that there is no difference between them.
New York Times columnist David Brooks is the Eddie Haskell of the Fourth Estate. Like the two-faced sycophant in "Leave It to Beaver," Brooks indulges in excessive politeness while currying favor with political authority. He prides himself on an oily semblance of maturity and rational discourse.

But the phony "conservative" back-stabber, who has spent the last four years slavering over Barack Obama like a One Direction groupie and trashing the tea party like an MSNBC junkie, isn't fooling anyone.

Lately, Brooks has been given to dispensing passive-aggressive advice to GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. His column this week titled "Thurston Howell...