When you attack the Second Amendment it draws us together. We KNOW that you wish to disarm us to more easily control us. The lessons of the past are not forgotten. And the Internet remembers....

Time to cut off the Democrats from banks...they never pay their bills in a timely, if at all, manner.

But Joey, The people in D.C. can't wander the street with a shotgun! Nor the people in Chicago! Well, unless you decide to get the Supreme Court to declare that we can all carry shotguns, as per the Second Amendment and that no jurisdiction can prevent good and honest people from doing just that. I'd love to carry a shotgun, a la, Ash in Evil Dead. Though I'd rather have a semi or pump instead of a two barrel...

Let me correct you. You are the ignorant one. Failure to recognize facts, clear and plain, is a flaw of the Liberal Fundamentalist. Sad to report you are one. You believe what you want to believe in spite of any relevant facts, conclusions, studies and history. It is "fingers in the ears and call names" for Liberal Fundamentalists.

Agreed...fully automatic? Not a single one. But scary looking? Yep. Sort of like how it must be to wake up to Feinstein in bed with you in the morning.

It is the "Bill of Rights" not the "Bill of Needs" nor the "Bill of Privileges" "Never forget, even for an instant, that the one and only reason anybody has for taking your gun away is to make you weaker than he is, so he can do something to you that you wouldn’t let him do if you were equipped to prevent it. This goes for burglars, muggers, and rapists, and even more so for policemen, bureaucrats, and politicians." - Aaron Zelman and L. Neil Smith, Hope (2001) We own firearms, as anyone who actually spent some time reading the Federalist and other papers at the time, to be able to take down the government in extremis. Not to hunt. To replace a government that is no longer "of the people, by the people, for the people."

Banning .22LR firearms...yeah..OK... Feinstein: Still ignorant and looking at form rather than function after all these years.

?"Never forget, even for an instant, that the one and only reason anybody has for taking your gun away is to make you weaker than he is, so he can do something to you that you wouldn’t let him do if you were equipped to prevent it. This goes for burglars, muggers, and rapists, and even more so for policemen, bureaucrats, and politicians." - Aaron Zelman and L. Neil Smith, Hope (2001)

?"Never forget, even for an instant, that the one and only reason anybody has for taking your gun away is to make you weaker than he is, so he can do something to you that you wouldn’t let him do if you were equipped to prevent it. This goes for burglars, muggers, and rapists, and even more so for policemen, bureaucrats, and politicians." - Aaron Zelman and L. Neil Smith, Hope (2001)

Well, That presumes that we'll have an election in four years and that presidential term limits still apply...

The police are "first responders" not "first preventers", if you will. They aren't there when things start except in rare occasions. That's why we have to call 911. ..we need them to come because they aren't on site. So yeah, whoever is on scene needs to be able to potentially take action. Armed citizens are a deterrent and have been repeatedly been shown to limit violence, through violent response, if necessary. I trust my neighbor, my other neighbor, the person in the grocery store and a lot of other people. Much more than I trust my current government.