In response to:

To Save Traditional Marriage, End State Involvement in Marriage

jsalamone Wrote: Mar 27, 2013 8:48 PM
The government doesn't and never did "define" marriage. Nature does. The government serves to protect its already inherent definition for the best interest of children. It's impossible to privatize marriage and would also not serve to protect the best interests of children... May I recommend the following?: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/04/5069/  http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/04/5071/  http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/04/5073/

Within the next few months, Justice Anthony Kennedy will likely rule that same-sex marriage is mandated by the Constitution of the United States. The ruling will offend both common sense and Constitutional law. But it will nonetheless become the law of the land. With it, states will be forced to recognize same-sex marriages; same-sex marriage will enter the public school lexicon; religious institutions will be forced to recognize same-sex marriages or lose their tax-exempt status. Religious Americans will be forced into violating their beliefs or facing legal consequences by the government. The First Amendment's guarantee of religious liberty will largely become...