1 - 10 Next
democrats are sexist as well as racist. That is obvious. The called mens liberation womens liberation to gain support from the unthinking. Now women have no choices concerning staying home with their children. They must work, now our economy is based on women working, numerous minimum wage hikes ensured inflation. Professions that once could support a family have fallen to the level of secondary incomes. Men need not support their children because the taxpayes will, men need not bother buying dinner to get what they want from a one night stand. At one time children were the first to be concidered in a divorce, now they are merely pawns for special interest manipulation.
No reason except reality.
200 years unheeded? Wonder how our nation became great in the first place, when people prayed and lived by Christian principals. Our downfall came when prayer was out lawed, is that merely a coinsidence?
Is that why Duncan was allowed in? Because he was heading to a red state?
Yet democrat policies do not harm the 1% in the least but it has nearly destroyed working families of all races. High energy prices for heating/cooling our homes and high gas prices at the pump doesn't touch the 1%. The 1% can hire armed security to protect them but the working people must be victims without defense. Working people are forced into government controlled healthcare while the 1% are exempt by being self insured. The 1% are distant from the threats of disease brought into our country by third world foreign nationals here legally or not. They are protected from the criminal gangs we must fear. The democrats serve the elite while trambling on the 99%.
After the violence and protests in Ferguson I don't have any faith that Blacks will look at the reality of what the democrats have done to them. They are still more than willing to make heroes out of thugs and cry racism without foundational facts.
In response to:

LGBT Strikes Again: Comply or Die

jrpublic Wrote: Oct 13, 2014 12:20 PM
Have the courts forgotten about our ninth amendment? Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Combine that with our first amendment: Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Time to fire some judges for not following our Constitution.
In response to:

Our Judicial Dictatorship

jrpublic Wrote: Oct 10, 2014 9:59 AM
Then there is the fact that the GOP has controlled both houses a minority of the time. Since 1945 they have had control of both houses only six terms. Not alot of power. We have allowed appointed judges to mandate morality and we wonder why we have to lock our doors. The democrats have manipulated our compassion and sense of fairness to the point of our destruction. They have indoctrinated our children into non-thinking drones, the question is, will we continue to allow this? We have reached a crossroad, it is in our hands this November as well as in 2016.
Yes the students do share the blame as well as their parents
Harvard and other so called ivy league schools survive on past glory only. A better education can be had at nowhere community college. This author is correct in admonishing parents to get off their duffs and stop supporting these mind destroying universities. Without money from tuition these academic has beens would either close down or revert to their original intent of actually teaching critical thinking and unscrewed history. We know by the products they produce how obviously destructive they are to the futures of all free people. Unfortunately the students are merely parrots of mindless self serving leaches they call professors, most of whom could not survive outside of academia. These formless students who cannot think for themselves nor support themselves yet are allowed to vote for our destruction. I remember the arguments for lowering the voting age from 21, it was not right to send troops to war that could not have a say. Instead of opening the opportunity to those troops alone, we allowed the immature dependent non giving mimics that privilege as well. Big mistake.
1 - 10 Next