Actually most racism doesn't come from trailers...it has taken President Bigotbreath and his "Justus Dept." to successfully reverse the colors of hate. And in the nick of time, too, just as the late civil rights movement had convinced many to reconsider the idea of skin colors as the origin of everyone's social value. Narrow escape that, what with the Democrat Party's dependence on racial demonization, first blacks, now whites, to support their perpetual election platform of racial favoritism.

Republicans collect just as much of OUR money as Democrats, by claiming that black favoritism will result in “equality” with their pretense of white to black redistribution, when the actuality is the confiscation of money and power from all colors of wage earners, enriching all politicians and a few lucky scholars and business owners of the favored color. Republican silence while conservatives act as the sole challengers of the Democrat Party’s stereotype driven election platform of black favoritism, leads non-racist voters to mistakenly believe Republicans are opposed to racial favoritism, so they keep their seats. But nationalized racial favoritism requires the self serving cooperation of a majority of politicians, which it has.

The Democrats do NOT have any minority vote; they have the majority bigot vote supporting politically imposed, media and education approved black favoritism, based upon the stereotypes of universally racist white oppressors. Thus Republicans can capture the votes of this currently racist majority, only via racism's remedy; by pointing out that color differences are actually irrelevant, that it is personal actions, not stereotypes coupled to history lessons that are the sole origin of the social worth of all people. But the contemptible Republicans will not run on a platform opposing racial favoritism, because the political process enriches _all_ politicians with money and power forced from _all_ colors of people.

Actually the actions of the two involved spurred the investigation; the colors of the two spurred the usual leftist media lynch mob, because it plays into left’s scenario of demonizing whites as genetically racist, needed to drum up a reason for their election platform of black favoritism. How do you think white slavers got political support for slavery except by demonizing blacks; how do you think Hitler got majority support for Aryan favoritism, except by demonizing Jews (as exploiters.) How do you think Stalin got support for communism except by demonizing shop owners as "exploiters." So buy a clue, all that ever changes in this same scenario is the stereotypes.

Modern liberals, including the left's politicians, universities and its media, have made billions more dollars more off historical slavery, than did historical plantation owners. Leftist politics, past and present, and global, as well, are a simple matter of demonizing one race or class, thereby creating a prejudiced majority, in order to buy that prejudiced majority's votes with the claim that "equality" requires the exploitation of the demonized. Although the political strategy creates such virulent hatred that it often inspires riots, pogroms or genocide, the voting majority, regardless of country, continues to fall for the scam, endlessly repeating history,never learning from it. So much for that "intelligent species" myth.

Wrong... racism is still prevalent in America and politically imposed as well, as the black favoritism/ white discrimination of affirmative action. The new racism is harder to recognize because Democrats have successfully reversed the colors of politically correct hate. Black favoritism is the Democrat Party’s only election platform, the one thing that differentiates them from the official Republican Party, who like the Democrats are also profiting from welfare state's paycheck confiscation. The creation of Democrat supporting anti-white bigots is the real reason behind the constant proselytization of the black favoritism supporting stereotypes of universally racist whites from whom blacks supposedly require political protection.

According to socialist apologists, exploitation is redefined as honestly earning a living by trading values rather than stealing values, politically or privately, after which socialist apologists go on to insist that freedom from this bogus “capitalist exploitation” requires the enforced redistributive welfare state exploitation of all wage earners in the holy name of the poor. The scam is perpetrated, not on the basis of any "confusion" over capitalism's benefits, but because socialist apologists like they think of themselves as “philanthropists,” but socialists are all too stingy to use their own money for charity.

Which fallible human being could you trust to originate a value system, one moral standard for all human beings. All claims to a value _system_ are claims to a superior moral standard. Setting a moral standard for all people declares that moral superiority is bestowed only upon those following the moral instructions inherent in that standard and _by default_, moral inferiority accrues from a failure to do so. Who among the world's population can be trusted to decide which people are morally superior and which, morally inferior. None. A superior moral authority, a God, is required to validate the means to moral superiority; without that God, all moral instruction is false.

Why do these so called educators get to keep morality in their secular humanism, when they have declared morality’s exclusive origin, non existent. The existence of morality requires an authority superior in morality to all human beings that exist, or ever have. No secular religion presumes an omniscient authority (a God) to validate the supremacy of a moral standard as instructions which must be followed as the means to moral superiority. Thus all non-religious claims to any moral standard, whether secular humanism or communism, are claims to an impossible "moral atheism," and are scams, declaring that moral superiority consists of masses of human beings obediently following the directions of a few fallible leaders.

The political promise is that forced income redistribution "equalizes" the stereotypes of “the poor” with "the rich." But non-existent stereotypes can't be equalized, so the process is imposed on real people, confiscating the paycheck of every real wage earner of every income level, rich and poor, for the primary benefit of millionaire politicians and their favored corporate campaign contributors. What ever is left over buys welfare dependent votes. This same irrational election promise of "equalizing stereotypes" is used by every tyrannical welfare state politician, world wide, because these same politicians _require_ majority support and they can't get it by saying, "elect me and I'll rob you blind."