1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Minority Student Needs

JR11 Wrote: Apr 03, 2013 8:08 PM
The Nazis were anti-liberal...that's hilarious, given that the Nazi agenda was the use of racial and class stereotypes to enforce the redistribution of income and property, which is precisely the liberal agenda, albeit the degree of enforced redistribution is not as extreme. (So far)The klan was big on race based redistribution, too. Try thinking about the political process of enforced redistribution and its universal validation scam, which is always based on class and/or racial stereotypes, instead of presuming that because the stereotypes are different, so must be the politics.
In response to:

The niggardly use of racial epithets

JR11 Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 9:29 AM
While the use of any racist epithet certainly damages credibility and intellectual competence, substituting the phrase “n-word” for the word “n.i.g.g.e.r” when discussing racism and the word’s impact, makes American journalists sound like kindergartners. This politically correct moratorium on _all_ use of the word “n.i.g.g.e.r” is, unlike, unified and socially beneficial protests against the public use of _all_ racial epithets, (of which there zero) is a resentment producing racist demand for submission, not for the mutual respect between equals necessary to social harmony.
In response to:

Diversity With Conceit

JR11 Wrote: Jan 25, 2013 2:22 PM
Obama’s election strategy is to buy the bigot vote with minority favoritism. That’s not “progress,” it’s “propaganda,” which has successfully redefined “civil rights” as white discrimination (as opposed to the equally racist propaganda of the past, that redefined civil rights as black discrimination.) That’s not “improvement,” that’s D.C. scum STILL buying votes with politically correct, forcibly imposed racial favoritism/discrimination. Those pictures of a “coming together” of different colors are not showing “diversity,” but similarity...that of racist fools celebrating successful racial discrimination in expectation of producing harmonious equality. Wrong means to that end, thus consequences will be the opposite (again.)
In response to:

Liberal Obsession With Race is Growing Old

JR11 Wrote: Dec 21, 2012 9:38 AM
The actual “difference” between the racism of today and that of the past is that the hate created by America’s perennial racial demagoguery targets whites, instead of minorities; a reversal of colors in unresolved racism, allowing the profitable purchase of the American majority bigot vote to continue, uncontested. And as long as the so called “opposition party” is too busy trying to buy this same bigot vote with affirmative action's politically correct, demagoguery “justified” minority favoritism/white discrimination to actually oppose this successful Democrat election platform, those opposed to racial favoritism (and its violent consequences) will remain the real and powerless minority, just as they were in the past.
...same position on illegal immigration as the Democrats. The only difference between the GOP and the Democrats is that Republican candidates promise that their own liberal agenda will be few million cheaper for tax payers. The GOP deserves this loss, because it is not freedom’s opposition to the American socialist welfare state; it is the cringing hypocrit’s me-too party of kinder, cheaper socialism.
While it’s reassuring to think that people like Breitbart speak for the Republican Party, they don’t. The election failure of the GOP is the fault of the GOP, a party of cowards and political profiteers that allows the conservative media to fight for a conservative agenda of limited government, zero political favoritism, whether corporate, racial or gender, an end to foreign handouts, no tax payer funding of welfare sloth, greed and criminality, as well as American border defense and prosecution of _illegal_ immigration. Meanwhile the actual GOP agenda is government expansion, buckets of taxpayer money for welfare thieves, here and in other countries, political favoritism of every group the Democrats favor, and the exact....
...as well as the profoundly stupid who look each day at tax engorged politicians living sumptuous lifestyles at the uncompensated expense of the rest of a gradually impoverished population, yet vote for the scum that claim the freedom to voluntarily exchange time, skills and resources to the mutual benefit of every participant, excluding _only_ both private and political profiteers, results exclusively in exploitation and inequality.
This artificial juxtaposition of supposed “opposites” absolutely obscures freedom’s voluntary, mutually profitable, exchange based redistribution just as though it doesn’t and never has existed. From the two artificially limited choices of private exploitation based redistribution or exploitative government enforced redistribution, the latter will artificially appear to be the best means to equality, to both greedy socialist sloth living on redistributive paycheck confiscations....
The sickness is called “envy,” the propaganda that persuades the envious to believe themselves self righteous social benefactors for demanding what they presume to be the equalizing consequences of enforced redistribution is called “socialism.” This process of self deceit, is effective only in hiding the self serving greed and envy of every socialist, and starts with the presumption that all the “redistribution” that has ever occurred has been enforced by private profiteers, a world veiw that artificially limits the entire concept of redistribution to inequality creating exploitation or politically enforced equalization.
In response to:

The Diversity Fetish

JR11 Wrote: Oct 12, 2012 10:46 AM
Good to read a journalist who can tell the difference between equality and the diversity scam’s, racist, government enforced color judgments.
1 - 10 Next
Sunday, May 19 | 05:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 05:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 05:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 05:46 AM ET