In response to:

Obama, Rubio Birthers Should Read the Law

jparsons Wrote: May 30, 2012 12:39 PM
While it is consistent to have several layers when you use OCR software while creating a .pdf the image is always on just one layer. The image is not separated into different layers, one for the signature, one for the stamp, one for part of the form and one for another part of the form. Certainly the image is not divided into 20 + layers as is the case with the BHO BC. There are many other anomalies present as well that are inconsistent with a scanned document. It has also been determined that the document was not scanned with OCR software. The investigations have been done. It is a complete fraud at 12 levels and not because it was BHO but because it was a fraud.

Birtherism -- the belief that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, not in the United States -- pretty much died last year when the White House released a copy of the president's long-form birth certificate showing he was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961. After that, the number of Americans who doubted Obama's place of birth dropped dramatically.

But not to zero. In recent days, there has been a mini-resurgence of birther talk, from Arizona, where the secretary of state questioned Obama's eligibility to be on the ballot, to Iowa, where some Republicans want to require presidential candidates to prove...