Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

The High Cost of Liberalism: Part II

Joycey Wrote: 15 hours ago (9:02 AM)
Yes he is. But I do not understand his criticism of Cruz unless he fears for the breakdown of the Republican party at this time and what that might do for the Communist cause of the Democrats. The Republican Party should embrace Cruz.
In response to:

The High Cost of Liberalism: Part II

Joycey Wrote: 15 hours ago (8:59 AM)
Amen.
In response to:

The High Cost of Liberalism: Part II

Joycey Wrote: 15 hours ago (8:58 AM)
After a great slaughter of Americans.
In response to:

The High Cost of Liberalism: Part II

Joycey Wrote: 15 hours ago (8:57 AM)
The Ukranians were disarmed of their nuclear weapons so that Putin could have his empire. America agreed to it. Great Britain agreed to it. WHY? Oil.
In response to:

The High Cost of Liberalism: Part II

Joycey Wrote: 15 hours ago (8:55 AM)
"and disarming them makes them vulnerable to those who are the least peaceful" This is the goal. Communists are criminals in heart and intent. They are just plain organized crime thugs. Out for monetary gain and power. They have no good intentions at all.
I think Holder needs to live in the ghetto for a couple of months.
What does Holder plan to do about recidivism?
And I doubt if their neighborhoods want them back.
Exactly.
I hate communism, no matter what human package it comes in. I am not prejudice. Equal opportunity communism hater.
I think they have government programs now that move the riff raff into the suburbs. For the children.
Previous 21 - 30 Next