In response to:
I'm waiting for the UN to get their act together on the anti-blasphemy law that's been bouncing around for almost 10 years now. The libs here will be going nuts when insulting someone's religious beliefs will land them in jail on a hate crime charge. That will eliminate about half the posts they make here that are nothing more than tirades against religion.
In Libya, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three colleagues were murdered Tuesday. Earlier that day, protesters in Egypt stormed the U.S. embassy and tore down the American flag.
It was "the day the roof fell in," proclaimed blogger and historian Walter Russell Mead. Barack Obama's "efforts to reconcile the U.S. and moderate Islamism -- in part by distancing the U.S. from Israel -- have angered Israel without reducing Islamist bitterness against the United States."
In other words, his Middle East policies are in shambles. His assumption that a president "who doesn't look like other presidents" would...
I wonder if there is *any* kind of accomodation we can make for the Islamic faith that will take us no further in the opposite direction from Free Speech than we've already gone via the Swastika hate-speech laws?
OK. All the twits start acting that way.
And I believe the ACLU established in court that Swastika-carrying Nazis could march in Skokie so you are simply lying about the swastika being prosecuted under the law in the USA as hate speech as opposed to misguided and totally illegal fascistic college campus speech codes. But lies are the libtard fallback position. I know you libs want to make the Stars and Bars illegal, though.
Now if you want to argue that Il Duce will still win and keep the Senate despite all this, that's up for argument. Not sure I'd put a lot of money on it either way. :(
Laws don't apply to left-libs under any circumstances -- just look at Sebelius campaigning on the taxpayer dime and not even getting a reprimand for it.