In response to:

So Fake It’s Real: Global Warming is Reality TV for the Media Elite

Joseph64 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 12:16 PM
The global warming morons are going around saying that Sandy was an example of the increasing intensity of storms due to global warming. What they aren't saying is that Sandy was not all that intense, even at it's height, and wasn't even a hurricane anymore by the time it made landfall in the US. I remember in 1979 when Hurricane David hit NJ after being downgraded to a tropical storm and that storm was at least as intense as Sandy was. The only difference between 1979 and 2012 is that in 2012 there was more development and hence more people affected and more infrastructure damaged. It was the growing population that led to the greater damages, not an increased intensity in storms.

Here’s my challenge to all the global warming apologists:

Explain to me why the “settled science” of global warming has to manipulate headlines to make information appear scarier and more threatening than the actual data shows.

If global warming is so settled, why do you and your friends take the opportunity to exaggerate, obfuscate and slant every piece of news that comes out to make it seem relevant to today?       

You can see an example of this in the headlines below:

Climate Change Main Contributor to Corn Volatility, Study Says” writes Bloomberg-BusinessWeek.