In response to:

How Conservatives Can Defeat Liberalism

Joseph64 Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 10:28 AM
Sorry, but you are wrong. In a truly just society nobody would have more healthcare than they can pay for with their own resources and nobody would be forced to subsidize someone else. You're not allowed to go into KMart with $100 in your pocket and walk out with $200 worth of goods, right? Why should you be allowed to screw over a doctor or hospital (or the taxpayers) when you can't at KMart? If walking out of KMart with more than you can pay for is theft, why isn't socialized medicine also theft?
Jack2894 Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 10:56 AM
I can see that you were anxious to make your own point instead of responding to mine, because you missed it entirely. The question is not which vision of justice is correct, the question is whether Chavez portrayed both visions accurately. Conservatives are going to keep losing the philosophical battle until they can improve their rhetorical skills, i.e. keep to the point and dont' argue with straw men.

Two weeks after the election, conservatives are still asking why Mitt Romney lost. That, however, is the wrong first question argues Charles R. Kesler in his new book "I am the Change: Barack Obama and the Crisis of Liberalism." We cannot fully understand Romney's defeat, implies Kelser, until we first understand why conservatives have lost the majority of policy battles over the past 100 years. Despite having won their share of Presidential elections, conservatives have not slowed the advance of the welfare state.

Political pundits have blamed Romney's defeat on everything from Hurricane Sandy to inept get-out-the vote efforts, but...