I don't think the staffers mind working for the Islamist Jihadi's...in fact I don't recall reading any complaints about that issue. They're more concerned about Big Al selling out to big Oil. As with everything on the left, it's 180 degrees bass ackwards. I don't blame Al one bit for selling out and making bank on it; but it sure would be nice if the lefties in this country would support my right to do the same.

My understanding is that this judge originally ruled that the law could be enforced. However, the PA Supreme Court sent it back the judge in such a way that there was no choice other than to temporarily rule that it could not enforced. This seems logical since the judge has indicated it will remain in place and be enforced during the next election cycle.

I don't disagree. I think two things were working against him, however. One, he like the rest of the panel were taken back by the visible anger Matthews was displaying. He really seemed like he wanted to come out of his seat and jab his finger in Priebus' chest. Second, Priebus is too professional to respond in an equally vile manner. I really wish he would have pushed Matthew's buttons with something like: Well, I'm sorry that Romney doesn't send shivers up your leg, but believe me when I say that four more years of Obama would cause anyone to shiver. Matthews has lost it, and he should be ignored. Returning fire only gives him more air time.