Surely you mean upobamasass? But nice try, an interesting take on progressive trolling.

Awesome imitation of Neville Chamberlain, Steve! Have you ever thought of a performing career? Because as a thinker, you're a brilliant entertainer. Best wishes,

Disagree completely. The adage 'don't vote, it only encourages them' has it exactly bass-ackwards; it's the lethargy of the electorate that encourages potential tyrants to think they can enforce their will. Mr. Jacoby has done the Republic a grave disservice with this foolish editorial.

'... none of these beliefs IS ...'

'Look, most of us see indecent exposure as more dangerous than forging petition signatures, but that doesn’t make forgery and fraud any better.' Really? I know I don't consider some kid waving his little worm around in public more dangerous than trying to subvert the political process. The one is merely pathetic, the other has much greater potential consequences. What a bizarre formulation.

'...executed.' Hah, that's a laugh! Nidal Hassan has not yet been executed, and probably never will be. If shooting your fellow soldiers in front of witnesses isn't treason meriting execution, nothing is.

Toe the line, Mr. Molen.

Good point about Congress, John. To be even more specific, who controlled the House, where spending bills originate? Mr.Goodman attempts to strengthen his argument by saying that some of these increases were created by executive fiat, but he does not include any numbers. I think his intent may be to say that electing Mr. Romney is not a solution in itself, which is correct. Conservatives have to be ever vigilant that our candidates hew to conservative principles and, more important, depend as little upon and contribute as little to government coffers as possible. Legal tax avoidance is now a patriotic duty.

Of course, Mr. Beauprez means fewer.

Surely this person is a conservative making his points by sarcasm? No one can really be THAT confused, can he? I thought we conservatives were supposed to be the stupid ones.