How the Gay-Marriage Mob Slimed Manny Pacquiao

homosexuality is an unhealthy,destructive behavior,resulting from mental illness.
it should not be accommodated,enabled,or encouraged.

This is all about the REDEFINITION of "marriage" to be something it's never been,and thus FORCING other states to recognize the abomination via Article IV,sec 1.

Of course,some people IGNORE the second part of Article IV,sec 1;
"and the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts,Records,and Proceedings shall be proved,and the Effect thereof."
Congress "prescribed the manner" by enacting DOMA.
THAT alone allows DOMA to be Constitutional.

Congress is SPECIFICALLY given the power to decide,and they did.

Queers do not scare me; they disgust me. Just the thjought of what these perverts do makes me want to puke.

JoJo: homosexuals are bringing their bedroon into inappropriate places.

Brain washed idiots like you can not figure that out?

JoJo, I am a Republican too, "100% behind states' rights and individual liberty." What's more, I'm not scared by homosexuality, nor do I want to ". . . get into everyone's bedroom to find out who they are having sex with." I do object to the bully-boy tactics of the homosexualists, who are determined to shut up (or else!) anyone who raises religious or prudential objections to homosexual marriage As a matter of individual liberty, being able to speak one's mind and defend one's religious beliefs publicly--the actual theme of Michelle's column--sure seems to come under that category. As a matter of states' rights, you might remember that the people of California twice voted for keeping marriage between one man and one woman.

There are degrees of "bullying," and nothing I have seen from the gay community comes close to the bullying gays receive in school, in church and even in their own homes.

This whole episode seems more like a free-speech issue than a "bullyiing" issue. Both sides had their say, the journalist had to admit that Pacquiao didn't really quote the Bible, there were apologies all around, and the columinsts like Malkin have fired back. Case closed.

People who exercise their right of free speech, however, should also understand that it's not protected from criticism.

Of course, David, it is understood that criticism is allowed. Hence the existence of forums like this.

But I don't see that there were apologies all around on this issue; certainly none from the homosexuals.

JoJo, you are a riot! You accuse Republicans of wanting to get into everyone's bedroom to find out who they are having sex with. Even if that accusation were true, there is no reason Repubs need to get into homosexuals' bedrooms to find out who they are having sex with. The homosexuals insist on broadcasting to the entire world whom they are having sex with.

If it is a states rights issue (and I agree that it is) then why did the pro-gay marriage activists take the issue to federal courts? The Homosexuality does not scare Republicans, we just don't want the redefinition of marriage shoved down our throats by mean narcissistic gay activists.

Blind Avocado, they took the case to the federal courts because most of the laws that benefit married couples are FEDERAL laws. Because of DOMA, they exclude gay couples even in gay-marriage states.

This is all about the REDEFINITION of "marriage" to be something it's never been,and thus FORCING other states to recognize the abomination via Article IV,sec 1.

Of course,some people IGNORE the second part of Article IV,sec 1;
"and the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts,Records,and Proceedings shall be proved,and the Effect thereof."
Congress "prescribed the manner" by enacting DOMA.
THAT alone allows DOMA to be Constitutional.

Congress is SPECIFICALLY given the power to decide,and they did.