Doc pls name the few who defend burning at the stake. Cuz I can name a ton of liberals who defend bombing by the roadside. Let's have that discussion.

I'm a good Catholic, not a good Christian. Just think of Sunday as the Ransom Inquisition. You're just mad because you either 1) are a scientist or 2) are attracted to one in the biblical sense. Pray and that too will be forgiven you. ;-)

You are correct, sir. You wouldn't happen to Winston Churchill? Sir?

Headline from National Journal says: "Experts Skeptical Homegrown Terrorists Were Behind Boston Bombings." The article then devotes 720 words of 950 explaining just which "patriot group," "militia," or "tax protest movement" could be behind the bombing. Muslims are mentioned...but only as targets for domestic terrorists. What freakin' world does the National Journal live in?

Attn: Social Security was designed right from the very beginning to be a system where current workers support the retired. Originally there were 12 workers for every retiree. Today there are 3 workers for every retiree. For those who think that Social Security was a retirement fund like a 401k you don't understand who Social Security was designed and how it continues to operate today.

Hmmm. Who to believe? The doctor who treats these people? Or Parksjm5? Parks does cite impressive evidence, like "knowing hundred or more people." On the other hand, the doctors treat these people...

I was kidding. Sorry if I offended.

I was kidding. Sorry if I offended.

Good. Thanks for leaving.

Correction has been made.

I posted a screen capture of it on the Comrade article.