In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

Johnny L. Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 12:58 AM
Great Article Ms. Parker. There are evil people who are trying to pervert our sacred institution of marriage into a tool to push acceptance of homosexuality. Good people must stand up to this and not be swayed by false characterizations of gay marriage being about "equality" or "freedom." A decade ago such notions would be laughable. Inequity? Who can a straight man marry that a "gay" one can't? Freedom? Who is saying that two people can't live together and call themselves married? No one. What we protest is merely using the power of the state to confer extraordinary benefits on such unions as a means of encouraging such unions.
will_8080 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 1:04 AM
"Who can a straight man marry that a 'gay' one can't?"

_______________

So you are advocating gay men to marry straight women?

Are there parents on this thread that would like your straight daughter to marry a gay man? Are we all good with this?
Jay Wye Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:41 AM
many homo men -have- married normal women.
for various reasons,not just to hide better in society.

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...