In response to:

Can You Imagine King George III Telling Our Nation’s Founders They Couldn’t Have Muskets?

Johnny L. Wrote: Jan 06, 2013 10:17 AM
Great article. It makes me sick seeing all these people blasting the Bushmaster on the grounds that it isn't good for home defense or hunting (there are debatably better choices for either). The whole point of the 2nd amendment is not to protect hunting and home defense. It is to protect against a tyrannical government, and for that you need guns designed to kill people. I brought up that point to my liberal uncle and he dismissed it out of hand, not seeming to realize that if you ban arms until you do get a dictator, by then it is too late. He also conveniently ignores the text of the constitution itself.

Don’t you love how the Left and their step-n-fetch media mavens are trying to make law-abiding gun owners the bad guys? You don’t? Yeah, me neither.

From Hollywood’s heavily armed guarded elite to the radical, anti-gun commie rag Journal News, peaceful and upright average Joes are being isolated and concentrated on as the bane of America’s existence just because we righteously and lawfully keep and bear arms.

Hollywood has even cobbled together a little tsk-tsk black and white video demanding our government do something about gun violence. That would be the very gun violence they have glamorized on the big screen...