In response to:

Roe v. Wade at 40

johnm h Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 11:01 AM
But the courts yes? R v W killed the issue in the states where the pro abortion folks were changing laws in their favor but wouldn't have been able to legalize unrestricted abortion or federal subsidies to abortion. It politicized the court and religion and made extremist modernist views main stream and has led liberals to the far left where to preserve their position they have been compelled to denigrate religion and all the western notions on which freedom was founded. Had the S Court not invented the right the court and the country would be better off. Even Ginsberg has said it was a mistake.

At last week's signing of "executive actions" designed to combat gun violence in America, President Obama, flanked by schoolchildren, said, "...when it comes to protecting the most vulnerable among us, we must act now."

There's no doubt that children, especially schoolchildren, are vulnerable to all kinds of threats, but are they "the most vulnerable," as the president claimed, or is there another category of human life that qualifies for that designation?

Forty years after a Supreme Court majority opened the door to legalized abortion, the number of aborted babies has reached roughly 55 million....