Good article he names them what they are. Get along? that is what Chamberlain said. It didn't work out so well. You can't compromise with communists, fascists, socialists or progressives, you see they have history on their side and are always right, and besides, not only are they smarter, they care more.
During the Los Angeles riots of 1992, Rodney King famously asked, “Can’t we all just get along?” The answer should be an easy and unequivocal “yes,” but it seems less and less likely these days.
King was speaking in term of race, but the same could be said of political ideology. Liberals, conservatives and every other point on the political spectrum used to co-exist fairly easily (with the exception of left-wing anarchists who don’t get along with anyone). But these days détente has given way to anger and open hostility.
Some, not all, people have become less civil to those...
You could have stopped after "communists". All the rest are covered as they are simply varying degrees, but communists none the less.
Only a matter of time now until this union of 50 states begins to unravel under it's own fiscal and regulatory weight as did the Soviet Union.
And every Governor that says His or Her State will not go along with this insane Obamacare makes me proud.
So,"progressive" DOES equal socialist/communist.
socialism is the first,necessary step to communism.
But people make too much about minor differences in definitions,when essentially and practically speaking,socialism IS communism.