In response to:

The Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Work Then and It Won’t Work Now

John in OK Wrote: Dec 30, 2012 10:45 AM
As usual, the liberals continue to blame the tool, rather than the hand holding it. Their response is the usual demand to sacrifice our freedom for no real gain. When Allison (or any other liberal) can explain how banning guns would have prevented the Oklahoma City massacre or 9/11 then I'll admit they might be on the right track. until then, the most that libs would accomplish is to make the would-be murderer seek other means to commit his crime, quite possibly worse means.

Senator Dianne Feinstein is queuing up come January 2013 to retable—yet again—an Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) in order to “severely mitigate the possibilities of another Sandy Hook atrocity.” Great idea, Dianne, as the first AWB that Clinton signed into law worked wonders in schools from 1994-2004. It was awesome. It panned out wonderfully aside from the following:

  • November 7, 1994: Wickliffe, Ohio: (Wickliffe Middle School shooting) Keith Ledeger, 37, a former student at the school, shot and killed custodian Pete Christopher and wounded four other adults.
  • January 12, 1995: Seattle, Washington: A...