1 - 10 Next
The fact that the Republican have to decide on an agenda indicates how bad things are going and how many issues there are in which to run against. Fast & Furious, Benghazi, IRS, NSA, VA, Obama-care and , most recently Bergdahl ... This is (sorry for the gratuitous "Top Gun" reference) a "target-rich environment." The only question I have is whether the Republicans will take full advantage of it. The RNC should put together a video montage of all of Obama's statements on the above scandals and then link those statements to every Democrat candidate whose running at every level. Send it to Local, State and National GOP organizations. And then give those GOP organizations the money they need to run those ads every hour on the hour from now until election day. The GOP needs to saturate the air with a conservative message; that's the only way to stop the Democrats.
Leave it to Boehner to pull defeat out of the jaws of victory. Could this man possibly be part of a liberal "sleeper cell" (along with John McCain and Lindsey Graham) that was infiltrated into the GOP for the purpose of destroying the party from within? Something to think about...
Nancy Pelosi has got to be the most air-headed person on this planet. The stereotypical ditzy blond California Girl has more upstairs that this one.
In response to:

A Real State of the Union

johninfwb Wrote: Feb 01, 2014 12:46 PM
One could only hope.
If the Republicans are going to attach the insurance company bailout repeal to the debt limit increase, why are they not attaching full repeal of Obamacare instead? If O'care goes away, there is no need for bailouts.
John Kerry... Collaborated with the North Vietnamese and now is collaborating with Palestinian terrorists. Imagine that.
In response to:

The Anus Monologues

johninfwb Wrote: Dec 31, 2013 5:45 PM
A&E quickly saw that they had stepped into a pile of s**t and that they had to weigh the cost of placating the gays (a very small part of their viewing audience) or losing their bigger audience. I totally agree with the Robertson family's view of homosexual behavior as well as the other acts of immorality that Phil pointed out. He did not target gays specifically but sins in general. I think his comments need to be taken in the entire context of what Phil said.
In response to:

The Anus Monologues

johninfwb Wrote: Dec 31, 2013 5:24 PM
I wonder if Phil had listed homosexual sex LAST on the list of sinful behavior, would GLAAD have gotten their (figurative) panties is such a wad?
Wonder how the narrative would have went if it was a black family adopting a white child. Probably would have been the sound of crickets!
In response to:

$2.2 Trillion in Exports Puts "E" in PE

johninfwb Wrote: Dec 31, 2013 4:10 PM
Regarding the "PE" reference in the title to the article: I'm not an economist (although I know how to balance a checkbook - which is probably more than most economists can do), so please explain what this means!?
1 - 10 Next