Previous 11 - 20 Next
Not anymore 'poisonous that some of Romney's gaffes, or any of the gaffes made by democrats, which are plenty. If we are suppose to get behind winning candidates, then we need to do so whether they are part of the establishment GOP or the tea party.
I agree Big, There have been others as well. Being from MO. Aiken could have won, despite the gaffe, if the GOP would have backed him. Instead, they allowed McCrackskell to win.
The more interesting question would be if the GOP would have backed the two tea party candidates if they had won. History says not.
So I suppose that the Republican party will want everyone to support Tilles and Boehner. I wonder if they would have supported the tea candidates, if they had won. Still an interesting question considering history.
I'm disappointed in PH, I went through this entire thread. Not once did you address the topic of the story. Stevens wants to do away with the 2nd amendment. Limit the 1st amendment. The issue of a death penalty belongs to the state. What do you think of Steven's opinions on this.
You keep setting up strawmen arguments. Did you see what Big Conservative wrote. There is no need to remove him, he is retired. How about answering the question about what you think of his wanting to change the Constitution.
I will step in here Political Historian and ask what do you think of his wanting to change the Constitution the way the story is stating?
It's a question that needs to be answered. GW?
Jesus was talking about individuals trollbot, not government.
I did vote for Romney in the last election even though he was not my first choice. But since he was nominated, I voted for him. This makes me wonder should somebody like Cruz or Scott Walker be nominated, would the GOP support him in the same way as they insist we support the estblishment GOP?
Previous 11 - 20 Next