In response to:

Of Mitts and Muslims

John910 Wrote: Sep 17, 2012 11:28 AM
My overall rection to the column: DUMB! It is rife with the type of emotional hyperbole that you would expect from the left. It does not pursue an intelligent line of thinking as to why we should take the various action he suggests. The idea of trashing such a great place as Alaska is ... dumb. Why can't we do the intelligent thing, as good conservatives, and manage the extraction of oil without laying waste (gut) to the state as a whole as Mr. Adams infers.? It can be done. The Israel-nuke thing is a flight of fantasy; knee-jerk at best. Let's put forth a well-thought policy of support and back it up with our actions - other than just off-loading nuclear weapons. Keep them under our control.
bgmk Wrote: Sep 17, 2012 12:07 PM
Johnnyhouse, the only person spewing emotional commiequeer* lines here is you?
Environmentalism over Sensible Energy Policy, "control" of nuclear weapons rather than their effective USE to TERRORIZE OUR ENEMIES.
"INTELLIGENT" thinking here recognizes that a Dark Age Barbarian Patriarchal KLANculture that Abuses Women, executes Down's Syndrome Rape Victims, Beheads Cartoonists and has even the CONCEPT of a Bacha Bazi Boy CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO EXIST in the 21st Century. Our Grandfathers knew this CLEARLY with the Japs and Nazis. Why do YOU remain in denial? The Sandyknickers are WORSE in every way.
The INTELLIGENT, NON "knee jerk" NON "fantasy" COGENT response is TO WIPE THEM FROM THE FACE of the PLANET like Grandpa did the Japs and Nazis.
TommyMaq Wrote: Sep 17, 2012 1:21 PM
Elimination is the game of the slave; us-vs-them.

Ostracization and honest attempts to reform are the proper attitude of a free person; useful-vs-useless

If you want to talk about the 21st Century, start by learning and adopting the correct moral code, K?
gwharpo Wrote: Sep 17, 2012 11:45 AM
"........The Israel-nuke thing is a flight of fantasy; knee-jerk at best. Let's put forth a well-thought policy of support and back it up with our actions - other than just off-loading nuclear weapons......."

We could throw in a wing of b-52's so they could effectively deliver them.
gwharpo Wrote: Sep 17, 2012 11:43 AM
Woooooooo............"hyperbole"
myhumbleopin Wrote: Sep 17, 2012 11:42 AM
I think he was exaggerating about "gutting" Alaska. One would hope; I mean, no need to "gut" the place! Just use some of the oil, as needed.

Dear Mitt: Despite the fact that I really do not trust or respect you, I have decided to give you some free political advice. I do it for two reasons: First, I would rather have a president I do not really trust (you) than one I actually despise (Obama). Second, the advisors and spokesmen you are paying are doing a woefully inadequate job of directing your campaign. Let me give you a couple of examples.

 

After the Chick-fil-A scandal consumed the country for weeks on end, you stated that you wanted to stay out of the controversy...