You are correct, but in Colorado Senator Bennet portrays himself as the champion of the little guy. However, he voted against the recent tax bill because of the compromise to $400k income vs $250k. He wanted to tax more people at lower incomes than was passed. I have not heard one word regarding him giving up any portion of his wealth to reduce the debt or to fund Obamacare. Vulture capitalist and sleight of hand artist is he.

You are correct, but in Colorado Senator Bennet portrays himself as the champion of the little guy. However, he voted against the recent tax bill because of the compromise to $400k income vs $250k. He wanted to tax more people at lower incomes than was passed. I have not heard one word regarding him giving up any portion of his wealth to reduce the debt or to fund Obamacare. Vulture capitalist and sleight of hand artist is he.

If they prove themselves to be as peaceful and non-imposing as the Amish, I would say Yes. However, your example is suspect because of the current state of Islam in the U.S. as well as in the world. The forces that I would consider good in Islam are not winning the battle, sadly. There is too much emphasis on forcing others to its ideology to foresee such a semi-separate Islamic community as being benign. They may already exist, but we don't hear about them.

"I can think of worse ways to waste 13 hours of the Senate's time." i can too. It's called the latest Senate Democrat budget. More taxes,no cuts, pork in, efficiency out. Senator Paul's action were far more laudable.

Your point is at best a red herring. Sowell presents a logical, scholarly analysis of the issue and you try to use the sleight of "left" hand tactic of bringing up something that is not germane to the article. Post it on Huffy.

Your point is at best a red herring. Sowell presents a logical, scholarly analysis of the issue and you try to use the sleight of "left" hand tactic of bringing up something that is not germane to the article. Post it on Huffy.

Not to worry. Only the good die young.

Keep chanting the mantra, lil leftie.

Once the Bible, and thereby God, is removed from the discussion, chaos will not be far behind. As Cal suggests, whose rules apply? Mine? George Soros'? Ahmadinejad's? NAMBLA's? The Hemlock Society's? The list is endless. The standard will be do what feels good. If that 14 year old girl says it feels good to have sex with the entire basketball team who are we to dispute it? After all, she has the tools of contraception and abortion to undue the unintended consequence. STD? I'm sure that won't be a problem. You can badmouth organized religion all day, but it doesn't change the basic principles of right and wrong that the Bible gives us as guidelines.

vapid

Keep chanting the mantra, lil libbie.