1 - 6
So she is a disgraceful liar.
Is Bowyer some kind of jester? We weren't worried about sinking wages during the founding period. There is no assimilation today, there is multiculturalism. Therefore, Bowyer's premise is illogical at best. Austrian economists' theories? Are you joking Bowyer? Nice theories don't create revenue, and nice theories don't limit the welfare state.
Mr. Bowyer is either misinformed or he's lying. 57% of Mexican immigrants are on some form of welfare. The welfare state is destroying our economy. Open borders invite wards of the welfare state. Immigrants will tend to support the welfare state. Therefore immigrants will tend to destroy our economy. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/8/slow-path-to-progress-for-us-immigrants/?page=2&source=Patrick.net Look at the states with the highest percentage of Hispanics and illegals. They are in a shambles, and they don't even resemble America. We have the worst economy since WWII, and this clown Bowyer is saying we should import more low-skilled laborers to drive wages down. What a disgraceful bunch of libertarian nonsense.
In response to:

Akin's Circular Firing Squad

John886 Wrote: Aug 24, 2012 10:19 AM
Akin stabbed the right in the back. He's a liability, you don't recover from something as awful as what he said. He minimized rape, he's done. He's the best thing the left has going for it right now. Think about it.
In response to:

Akin's Circular Firing Squad

John886 Wrote: Aug 23, 2012 4:06 PM
Why are people still defending Akin's remarks? Akin's campaign is admitting that he was factually wrong: "Campaign spokesman Ryan Hite said the apology was intended to cover the reference to "legitimate rape" and Akin's assertion that rape victims have a natural defense against pregnancy." http://www.wtop.com/278/2999438/Mo-lawmaker-still-defiant-wont-quit-Senate-race- You've got to be a pretty thoughtless hack to go around making excuses for a man when that man isn't even making those excuses for himself.
In response to:

Akin's Circular Firing Squad

John886 Wrote: Aug 23, 2012 3:54 PM
You are making a defense of Akin's remarks that not even Akin is making. Let's see a citation to the National Academy of Sciences. Not even Akin is standing by the factual accuracy of the remark he made.
1 - 6