In response to:

Legitimate Rape Arguments

John7286 Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 10:36 AM
J.C. Willke, M.D. fully explains this at http://www.physiciansforlife.org/content/view/492/26/ So Mr. Akin should have used genuine or force or some other word instead of "legitimate". It is all semantics and makes a mountain out of a mole hill. You have fallen into the liberal's trap. Untwist you undies, guys.
modernmover Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 11:26 AM
Is the legitimate wording used to differentiate between violent rape and statutory rape, with the latter possibly being consensual? If that were the case, the statement may be true, if you were to believe his science to begin with.
shubi_ Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 10:42 AM
Exactly right, John.
Ignorance is no excuse when you support baby murderers.
Todd Akin’s grossly irresponsible remarks about “legitimate rape” and conception have received much media attention. As well they should. The sheer weirdness of the remarks calls into question both his intelligence and his personal integrity. How could someone conclude logically that a rape victim’s body has the capacity to prevent conception in the wake of sexual assault? And why would someone assert that the conclusion had been supported by doctors with whom he had spoken? Clearly, Akin contrived the idea on the spot and then contrived the claim that there were doctors who had informed and/or supported his assertion. All of...