In response to:

The Supreme Oxymorons

John634 Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 12:02 PM
Then why did the House vote to have Holder held in contempt? Remember, you're dealing with the Executive Branch when you refer to Holder. The bad thing is his Justice Department refuses to prosecute him. Maybe the answer is to have the whole department held in Contempt. That way and independent prosocutor could be hired and a grand jury could be impaneled to solve the matter.

With the Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, Obamacare has achieved its first milestone: The repudiation of logic, the Orwellian assertion that A both is and is not A.

The massive healthcare package, officially titled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, requires that individuals buy medical insurance. The law imposes a fine on those who fail to purchase the government-approved and regulated insurance.

The legislation refers to this financial penalty 18 times. It never once refers to it as a tax. (Note: you can find